Supporting psychological safety in teamwork – in which ways do engineering students feel safe doing creativity–focused interventions in a PBL environment?

We explore which aspects of creativity-focused interventions in a PBL setting first-year students consider meaningful for psychological safety. Four significantly different collective opinions were identified among 27 students through Q-factor analysis: 1) individual efforts within teamwork; 2) individual confidence within teamwork; 3) team management and performance; and 4) teamwork for idea building. Participants reported contradictory but overlapping perceptions of diverse psychological safety aspects during team creativity development. The results call for more structured educational interventions scaffolding students to link creativity exercises with reflections on psychological safety, and progressive evaluation to better observe students’ psychological safety feelings during team creativity development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Engineering Education
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2025.2522278
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting psychological safety in teamwork – in which ways do engineering students feel safe doing creativity–focused interventions in a PBL environment?

Xiangyun Du, Juebei Chen, Søren Hansen, Niels Erik Ruan Lyngdorf et al.
European Journal of Engineering Education
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

Supporting psychological safety in teamwork – in which ways do engineering students feel safe doing creativity–focused interventions in a PBL environment?

Xiangyun Du, Juebei Chen, Søren Hansen, Niels Erik Ruan Lyngdorf, Lykke Brogaard Bertel
article en

Abstract

We explore which aspects of creativity-focused interventions in a PBL setting first-year students consider meaningful for psychological safety. Four significantly different collective opinions were identified among 27 students through Q-factor analysis: 1) individual efforts within teamwork; 2) individual confidence within teamwork; 3) team management and performance; and 4) teamwork for idea building. Participants reported contradictory but overlapping perceptions of diverse psychological safety aspects during team creativity development. The results call for more structured educational interventions scaffolding students to link creativity exercises with reflections on psychological safety, and progressive evaluation to better observe students’ psychological safety feelings during team creativity development.

European Journal of Engineering Education
Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.