A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Street Vitality in a Historic Neighborhood Using Multi-Source Geo-Data: A Case Study of Shuitingmen, Quzhou
Territorial tourism has brought new development opportunities for historic and cultural neighborhoods. However, an insufficient understanding of the spatial distribution and influencing mechanisms of neighborhood vitality continues to constrain effective revitalization strategies. This study takes the Shuitingmen Historical and Cultural Neighborhood in Quzhou, China, as a case study and develops a multi-dimensional vitality evaluation framework incorporating point-of-interest (POI) data, location-based service (LBS) heatmaps, street network data, historical resources, and environmental perception indicators. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied to assign indicator weights and calculate composite vitality scores across 19 streets. The results reveal that (1) comprehensive evaluation corrects the bias of single indicators and highlights the value of integrated assessment; (2) vitality is higher on rest days than on weekdays, with clear temporal patterns and two types of daily fluctuation trends—similar and differential; and (3) vitality levels are spatially uneven, with higher vitality in central and western areas and lower performance in the southeast, often related to low accessibility and functional monotony. This study confirms a strong positive correlation between street vitality and objective spatial factors, offering strategic insights for the micro-scale renewal and sustainable revitalization of historic neighborhoods.
Authors
- Jiehui Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4928-6524)
- Lu Ding (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1454-1532)
- Guoquan Zheng
Institutions
- Zhejiang A & F University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
- Published
- 2025-06-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14070240
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.32
Funders
- National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
- National Social Science Fund of China