Commentary on the use of statistical tests in experimental pharmacological studies

The meaningfulness of the research findings is largely determined by the depth of statistical processing and the quality of their presentation. However, the paucity of high-quality statistical analysis and data presentation poses a significant challenge for maintaining the consistency of published research results. Incorrect processing of primary data can result in distorted conclusions and significantly complicate the generalization of data on a specific research topic. The authors discuss the most frequent and incorrect techniques used in working with initial data and planning an experiment, including issues related to the calculation of sample size, the incorrect use of statistical tests, the identification of numerical statistical parameters and descriptive statistics, and the use of goodness-of-fit and data presentation tests. They also provide recommendations on the appropriateness or inappropriateness of specific methods. Graphic visualization requires that certain principles be followed. For normal distributions, the sample mean is the most practical measure for position. It is a generally accepted practice to show the standard deviation on the graphs as a measure of variability. Confidence intervals are also presented to offer a visual reference. Standard errors may also be represented, however, they are not indicative of data variability, but rather, they are an estimation of the difference between the sample mean and the mean population value. Medians are used to describe non-normal distributions because they are insensitive to outliers. In those specific cases, interquartile ranges (Q1-Q3) can be used as a measure of variability. In the context of large data sets, bar graphs, histograms, box-and-whiskers, and individual values may be considered to enhance the comprehension of visual presentations. The authors strongly advise against the use of tables for displaying large amounts of data, citing the challenges associated with reading such presentations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychopharmacology & biological narcology
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/phbn677119
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commentary on the use of statistical tests in experimental pharmacological studies

Aleksandra A. Blazhenko, Э.Р. Бычков, Platon P. Khokhlov, Alina А. Nuzhnova et al.
Psychopharmacology & biological narcology
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Commentary on the use of statistical tests in experimental pharmacological studies

Aleksandra A. Blazhenko, Э.Р. Бычков, Platon P. Khokhlov, Alina А. Nuzhnova, Maria Kostina
article en

Abstract

The meaningfulness of the research findings is largely determined by the depth of statistical processing and the quality of their presentation. However, the paucity of high-quality statistical analysis and data presentation poses a significant challenge for maintaining the consistency of published research results. Incorrect processing of primary data can result in distorted conclusions and significantly complicate the generalization of data on a specific research topic. The authors discuss the most frequent and incorrect techniques used in working with initial data and planning an experiment, including issues related to the calculation of sample size, the incorrect use of statistical tests, the identification of numerical statistical parameters and descriptive statistics, and the use of goodness-of-fit and data presentation tests. They also provide recommendations on the appropriateness or inappropriateness of specific methods. Graphic visualization requires that certain principles be followed. For normal distributions, the sample mean is the most practical measure for position. It is a generally accepted practice to show the standard deviation on the graphs as a measure of variability. Confidence intervals are also presented to offer a visual reference. Standard errors may also be represented, however, they are not indicative of data variability, but rather, they are an estimation of the difference between the sample mean and the mean population value. Medians are used to describe non-normal distributions because they are insensitive to outliers. In those specific cases, interquartile ranges (Q1-Q3) can be used as a measure of variability. In the context of large data sets, bar graphs, histograms, box-and-whiskers, and individual values may be considered to enhance the comprehension of visual presentations. The authors strongly advise against the use of tables for displaying large amounts of data, citing the challenges associated with reading such presentations.

Psychopharmacology & biological narcologyVol. 16(2)
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.