The Effectiveness of Digital vs. Analogue Teaching Resources in a Flipped Classroom for Undergraduate Focus Cardiac Ultrasound Training: A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Single-Centre Study
Introduction: This study investigated the effectiveness of e-learning compared to traditional teaching methods in ultrasound education, centring on a focus cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) course for third-year undergraduate medical students. With the rise of digital teaching methods, it is essential to evaluate their impact on the development of theoretical and practical skills in ultrasound training. Methods: A prospective, randomised, controlled trial was conducted involving two groups of students participating in a one-day FoCUS course delivered in a flipped classroom format. The study group used e-learning resources, while the control group used hard-copy lecture notes. Assessments were conducted at three stages: before the course, during the preparation phase, and after the course. Evaluations included self-assessment surveys, theory tests, and practical exams using direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) tests. The study group had 15% less practice time compared to the control group. Results: A total of 109 complete datasets (study group, n = 52; control group, n = 57) were analysed. Both groups showed an equivalent initial level of and a continuous and significant (p < 0.01) increase in subjective and objective skills over the evaluated time frame. The study group achieved significantly (p = 0.03) higher results in DOPS (T2) than the control group. No significant differences were found in the total scores of the theory tests (T2 + T3) or DOPS (T3). Both groups rated their teaching materials, motivation, and the course concept in similarly high scale ranges. Conclusions: The findings suggest that e-learning is as effective as traditional methods in developing ultrasound skills and may serve as a viable alternative, even with reduced face-to-face interaction. These results indicate that accreditation processes could be applied similarly to those for traditional formats without requiring in-person training as a prerequisite for quality
Authors
- Johannes Ruppert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3509-422X)
- Elias Waezsada
- Andreas Weimer
- Sandra Kurz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7785-7390)
- Holger Buggenhagen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6587-9819)
- Sebastian Göbel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8974-2523)
- Julia Weinmann‐Menke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7344-8381)
- Roman Kloeckner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-4792)
- Johannes Weimer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3759-8176)
- Florian Recker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9135-4338)
- Lukas Müller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0743-3357)
- Rebecca Krüger
- Liv-Annebritt Lorenz
Institutions
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- University Hospital Bonn (DE)
- Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia (DE)
- University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- University of Lübeck (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Education Sciences
- Published
- 2025-06-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070810
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.18