Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals complex interactions between natural capital in orchards: Insights into arthropod community dynamics and foraging diversity

Natural vegetation fragments in agroecosystems often support relatively diverse arthropod communities and the ecosystem services they deliver. Unfortunately, these natural fragments are not typically accounted for in farm management, partly due to the challenges in applying conventional approaches (e.g., sweep netting) to monitor arthropod-plant interactions at the vast scale of agroecosystems. Increasingly, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding—a molecular method capable of amplifying trace amounts of DNA—has been applied in agriculture to monitor arthropod-plant interactions. Here, we used pan traps and eDNA metabarcoding of pan-trap water to measure the response of two environmental indicators—orchard arthropod community diversity and arthropod-plant foraging diversity—to the presence of adjacent natural vegetation and crop flowering intensity. We sampled six orchards, adjacent to either pasture habitat or natural vegetation, across four time points during crop flowering. In total, we collected more than 2,000 arthropod specimens and identified over 250 plant taxa from eDNA, including crops, weeds and native Australian flora. Adjacent habitat type did not significantly influence arthropod species richness or abundance. However, orchards adjacent to natural vegetation showed increased capture rates of beneficial native bee ( Lasioglossum sp.) and hoverfly ( Melangyna viridiceps ) species. Additionally, pan traps in orchards adjacent to natural vegetation contained more than double the number of foraging plant genera at low crop flowering compared to pan traps at orchards adjacent to pasture. Our findings highlight that eDNA-based monitoring can enhance our understanding of the biological processes that influence crop productivity while also revealing the complex interactions between different components of natural capital in agroecosystems. • eDNA showed that orchard arthropods visit crops, understorey weeds and native taxa. • Arthropod foraging diversity is greater in orchards adjacent to natural vegetation. • Natural vegetation fragments enhance the presence of beneficial arthropods. • Arthropod diversity is greater in adjacent areas of natural vegetation. • eDNA metabarcoding is a useful tool for assessing natural capital in agroecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100765
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals complex interactions between natural capital in orchards: Insights into arthropod community dynamics and foraging diversity

Nicole E. White, Paul Nevill, Joshua H. Kestel, Philip W. Bateman et al.
2 citations
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
3.43
article

Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals complex interactions between natural capital in orchards: Insights into arthropod community dynamics and foraging diversity

Nicole E. White, Paul Nevill, Joshua H. Kestel, Philip W. Bateman, David L. Field, Christopher Swinstead
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Natural vegetation fragments in agroecosystems often support relatively diverse arthropod communities and the ecosystem services they deliver. Unfortunately, these natural fragments are not typically accounted for in farm management, partly due to the challenges in applying conventional approaches (e.g., sweep netting) to monitor arthropod-plant interactions at the vast scale of agroecosystems. Increasingly, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding—a molecular method capable of amplifying trace amounts of DNA—has been applied in agriculture to monitor arthropod-plant interactions. Here, we used pan traps and eDNA metabarcoding of pan-trap water to measure the response of two environmental indicators—orchard arthropod community diversity and arthropod-plant foraging diversity—to the presence of adjacent natural vegetation and crop flowering intensity. We sampled six orchards, adjacent to either pasture habitat or natural vegetation, across four time points during crop flowering. In total, we collected more than 2,000 arthropod specimens and identified over 250 plant taxa from eDNA, including crops, weeds and native Australian flora. Adjacent habitat type did not significantly influence arthropod species richness or abundance. However, orchards adjacent to natural vegetation showed increased capture rates of beneficial native bee ( Lasioglossum sp.) and hoverfly ( Melangyna viridiceps ) species. Additionally, pan traps in orchards adjacent to natural vegetation contained more than double the number of foraging plant genera at low crop flowering compared to pan traps at orchards adjacent to pasture. Our findings highlight that eDNA-based monitoring can enhance our understanding of the biological processes that influence crop productivity while also revealing the complex interactions between different components of natural capital in agroecosystems. • eDNA showed that orchard arthropods visit crops, understorey weeds and native taxa. • Arthropod foraging diversity is greater in orchards adjacent to natural vegetation. • Natural vegetation fragments enhance the presence of beneficial arthropods. • Arthropod diversity is greater in adjacent areas of natural vegetation. • eDNA metabarcoding is a useful tool for assessing natural capital in agroecosystems.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 27
Curtin University (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.