Role of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions during 1918–1920 Influenza Pandemic, Alaska, USA

Previous studies investigating the 1918–1920 influenza pandemic have provided a comprehensive overview of the spread of the pandemic and possible explanations for high mortality rates in Alaska, USA. Our understanding of the role of nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) is limited, however. To gain an overview of various agencies’ efforts to protect communities during the pandemic, we conducted a mixed-method assessment of a large pool of digitized historical newspapers and archival materials covering Alaska’s local and territorial responses to the pandemic. The study encompassed 14 local units of Alaska that implemented NPIs during October 1918–January 1919. Analyses indicated that 8 local units avoided the outbreak by implementing NPIs and that the other 6 units controlled the spread of influenza by implementing NPIs after the virus was introduced. In addition, some Indigenous communities escaped the pandemic by implementing mandatory and voluntary restrictions. Information on the effects NPI of could guide future influenza pandemic preparedness and response.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Emerging infectious diseases
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3107.241048
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions during 1918–1920 Influenza Pandemic, Alaska, USA

Lisa Sattenspiel, Svenn‐Erik Mamelund, Uddhav Khakurel
2 citations
Emerging infectious diseases
Influenza Virus Research Studies
2.71
article

Role of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions during 1918–1920 Influenza Pandemic, Alaska, USA

Lisa Sattenspiel, Svenn‐Erik Mamelund, Uddhav Khakurel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Previous studies investigating the 1918–1920 influenza pandemic have provided a comprehensive overview of the spread of the pandemic and possible explanations for high mortality rates in Alaska, USA. Our understanding of the role of nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) is limited, however. To gain an overview of various agencies’ efforts to protect communities during the pandemic, we conducted a mixed-method assessment of a large pool of digitized historical newspapers and archival materials covering Alaska’s local and territorial responses to the pandemic. The study encompassed 14 local units of Alaska that implemented NPIs during October 1918–January 1919. Analyses indicated that 8 local units avoided the outbreak by implementing NPIs and that the other 6 units controlled the spread of influenza by implementing NPIs after the virus was introduced. In addition, some Indigenous communities escaped the pandemic by implementing mandatory and voluntary restrictions. Information on the effects NPI of could guide future influenza pandemic preparedness and response.

Emerging infectious diseasesVol. 31(7)
University of Missouri
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Role of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions during 1918–1920 Influenza Pandemic, Alaska, USA — Lisa Sattenspiel, Svenn‐Erik Mamelund, et al. · Emerging infectious diseases (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS