Examining treatment outcomes for military service members in an intensive treatment program for posttraumatic stress disorder

To date, few studies have evaluated treatment outcomes for military service members who complete massed treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Furthermore, no studies have directly compared treatment outcomes between service members and veterans in a massed treatment setting. In the present study, we evaluated treatment outcomes for military service members who completed an intensive treatment program (ITP) for PTSD and compared their outcomes to military veterans who completed the same program. Data were collected from 558 participants who identified as U. S. military service members (<i>n</i> = 68) or veterans (<i>n</i> = 490) during a two-week, cognitive processing therapy-based ITP. Results showed that service members and veterans experienced large reductions in PTSD (<i>d</i> = 1.26 & <i>d</i> = 1.35, respectively) and depression (<i>d</i> = .82 & <i>d</i> = 1.01, respectively) severity after treatment. In addition, the reductions in PTSD and depression severity for service members were equivalent to those of veterans using a Bayes factor equivalence approach. This study contributes to the limited literature on treatment outcomes for service members who complete massed treatments for PTSD. This research is particularly important as lawmakers and military leaders continue to remove barriers to treatment for service members suffering with PTSD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Military Psychology
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2025.2521951
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining treatment outcomes for military service members in an intensive treatment program for posttraumatic stress disorder

Philip Held, Dale L. Smith, Sarah Pridgen, Blake S. Schroedter et al.
1 citations
Military Psychology
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
2.31
article

Examining treatment outcomes for military service members in an intensive treatment program for posttraumatic stress disorder

Philip Held, Dale L. Smith, Sarah Pridgen, Blake S. Schroedter, Jonathan W. Murphy, Kevin Hiner, Joseph Zolper
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To date, few studies have evaluated treatment outcomes for military service members who complete massed treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Furthermore, no studies have directly compared treatment outcomes between service members and veterans in a massed treatment setting. In the present study, we evaluated treatment outcomes for military service members who completed an intensive treatment program (ITP) for PTSD and compared their outcomes to military veterans who completed the same program. Data were collected from 558 participants who identified as U. S. military service members (<i>n</i> = 68) or veterans (<i>n</i> = 490) during a two-week, cognitive processing therapy-based ITP. Results showed that service members and veterans experienced large reductions in PTSD (<i>d</i> = 1.26 & <i>d</i> = 1.35, respectively) and depression (<i>d</i> = .82 & <i>d</i> = 1.01, respectively) severity after treatment. In addition, the reductions in PTSD and depression severity for service members were equivalent to those of veterans using a Bayes factor equivalence approach. This study contributes to the limited literature on treatment outcomes for service members who complete massed treatments for PTSD. This research is particularly important as lawmakers and military leaders continue to remove barriers to treatment for service members suffering with PTSD.

Military Psychology
Rush University Medical Center (US), University of Illinois System (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, USAA
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.