Fast and accurate in silico antigen typing with Kaptive 3

Surface polysaccharides are common antigens in priority pathogens and therefore attractive targets for novel control strategies such as vaccines, monoclonal antibody and phage therapies. Distinct serotypes correspond to diverse polysaccharide structures that are encoded by distinct biosynthesis gene clusters; e.g. the <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> species complex (KpSC) K- and O-loci encode the synthesis machinery for the capsule (K) and outer-lipopolysaccharides (O), respectively. We previously presented Kaptive and Kaptive 2, programmes to identify K- and O-loci directly from KpSC genome assemblies (later adapted for <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>), enabling sero-epidemiological analyses to guide vaccine and phage therapy development. However, for some KpSC genome collections, Kaptive (v≤2) was unable to type a high proportion of K-loci. Here, we identify the cause of this issue as assembly fragmentation and present a new version of Kaptive (v3) to circumvent this problem, reduce processing times and simplify output interpretation. We compared the performance of Kaptive v2 and Kaptive v3 for typing genome assemblies generated from subsampled Illumina read sets (decrements of 10× depth), for which a corresponding high-quality completed genome was also available to determine the 'true' loci (<i>n</i>=549 KpSC, <i>n</i>=198 <i>A</i>. <i>baumannii</i>). Both versions of Kaptive showed high rates of agreement to the matched true locus amongst 'typeable' locus calls (≥96% for ≥20× read depth), but Kaptive v3 was more sensitive, particularly for low-depth assemblies (at <40× depth, v3 ranged 0.85-1 vs v2 0.09-0.94) and/or typing KpSC K-loci (e.g. 0.97 vs 0.82 for non-subsampled assemblies). Overall, Kaptive v3 was also associated with a higher rate of optimal outcomes; i.e. loci matching those in the reference database were correctly typed, and genuine novel loci were reported as untypeable (73-98% for v3 vs 7-77% for v2 for KpSC K-loci). Kaptive v3 was >1 order of magnitude faster than Kaptive v2, making it easy to analyse thousands of assemblies on a desktop computer, facilitating broadly accessible <i>in silico</i> serotyping that is both accurate and sensitive. The Kaptive v3 source code is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/klebgenomics/Kaptive), and has been implemented in Kaptive Web (https://kaptive-web.erc.monash.edu/).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microbial Genomics
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001428
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
32.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fast and accurate in silico antigen typing with Kaptive 3

Thomas D. Stanton, Kelly L. Wyres, Marit Andrea Klokkhammer Hetland, Kathryn E. Holt et al.
19 citations
Microbial Genomics
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
32.61
article

Fast and accurate in silico antigen typing with Kaptive 3

Thomas D. Stanton, Kelly L. Wyres, Marit Andrea Klokkhammer Hetland, Kathryn E. Holt, Iren H. Löhr
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Surface polysaccharides are common antigens in priority pathogens and therefore attractive targets for novel control strategies such as vaccines, monoclonal antibody and phage therapies. Distinct serotypes correspond to diverse polysaccharide structures that are encoded by distinct biosynthesis gene clusters; e.g. the <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> species complex (KpSC) K- and O-loci encode the synthesis machinery for the capsule (K) and outer-lipopolysaccharides (O), respectively. We previously presented Kaptive and Kaptive 2, programmes to identify K- and O-loci directly from KpSC genome assemblies (later adapted for <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>), enabling sero-epidemiological analyses to guide vaccine and phage therapy development. However, for some KpSC genome collections, Kaptive (v≤2) was unable to type a high proportion of K-loci. Here, we identify the cause of this issue as assembly fragmentation and present a new version of Kaptive (v3) to circumvent this problem, reduce processing times and simplify output interpretation. We compared the performance of Kaptive v2 and Kaptive v3 for typing genome assemblies generated from subsampled Illumina read sets (decrements of 10× depth), for which a corresponding high-quality completed genome was also available to determine the 'true' loci (<i>n</i>=549 KpSC, <i>n</i>=198 <i>A</i>. <i>baumannii</i>). Both versions of Kaptive showed high rates of agreement to the matched true locus amongst 'typeable' locus calls (≥96% for ≥20× read depth), but Kaptive v3 was more sensitive, particularly for low-depth assemblies (at <40× depth, v3 ranged 0.85-1 vs v2 0.09-0.94) and/or typing KpSC K-loci (e.g. 0.97 vs 0.82 for non-subsampled assemblies). Overall, Kaptive v3 was also associated with a higher rate of optimal outcomes; i.e. loci matching those in the reference database were correctly typed, and genuine novel loci were reported as untypeable (73-98% for v3 vs 7-77% for v2 for KpSC K-loci). Kaptive v3 was >1 order of magnitude faster than Kaptive v2, making it easy to analyse thousands of assemblies on a desktop computer, facilitating broadly accessible <i>in silico</i> serotyping that is both accurate and sensitive. The Kaptive v3 source code is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/klebgenomics/Kaptive), and has been implemented in Kaptive Web (https://kaptive-web.erc.monash.edu/).

Microbial GenomicsVol. 11(6)
Burnet Institute (AU), Stavanger University Hospital (NO), The Alfred Hospital (AU), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), University of Bergen (NO), Monash University (AU)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
32.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.