Detecting AI-Generated Speech Manipulation through CNN-BiLSTM Hybrid Networks

Audio forgery, the malicious manipulation or generation of audio content, poses significant threats to privacy, security, and digital trust. Various audio forgeries are prevalent today, including copy-move forgery, splicing, noise injection, Text-to-Speech (TTS), time stretching, pitch shifting, voice conversion (VC), resampling, and deep forgery. Among these, TTS and VC attacks emerge as particularly concerning due to their ability to mimic genuine voices, enabling identity theft and misinformation convincingly. While existing research predominantly focuses on detecting copy-move forgeries, this paper addresses the relatively underexplored challenges of detecting Text-to-Speech and voice conversion forgeries. A hybrid CNN-Bidirectional LSTM model is proposed, which uses convolutional layers for spectral feature extraction and bidirectional LSTM layers for temporal pattern recognition. To enhance robustness, audio augmentations are applied during preprocessing. The model is built and tested on the ASVspoof 2019 LA dataset, achieving an accuracy of 96.65% in identifying advanced audio forgeries. This study bridges a critical gap in audio forgery detection and provides a foundation for safeguarding audio authenticity against emerging threats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ispcc66872.2025.11039608
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting AI-Generated Speech Manipulation through CNN-BiLSTM Hybrid Networks

Sweta Tripathi, Rahul Dixit, Anuja Dixit, Arjun Agrawal
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Detecting AI-Generated Speech Manipulation through CNN-BiLSTM Hybrid Networks

Sweta Tripathi, Rahul Dixit, Anuja Dixit, Arjun Agrawal
article en

Abstract

Audio forgery, the malicious manipulation or generation of audio content, poses significant threats to privacy, security, and digital trust. Various audio forgeries are prevalent today, including copy-move forgery, splicing, noise injection, Text-to-Speech (TTS), time stretching, pitch shifting, voice conversion (VC), resampling, and deep forgery. Among these, TTS and VC attacks emerge as particularly concerning due to their ability to mimic genuine voices, enabling identity theft and misinformation convincingly. While existing research predominantly focuses on detecting copy-move forgeries, this paper addresses the relatively underexplored challenges of detecting Text-to-Speech and voice conversion forgeries. A hybrid CNN-Bidirectional LSTM model is proposed, which uses convolutional layers for spectral feature extraction and bidirectional LSTM layers for temporal pattern recognition. To enhance robustness, audio augmentations are applied during preprocessing. The model is built and tested on the ASVspoof 2019 LA dataset, achieving an accuracy of 96.65% in identifying advanced audio forgeries. This study bridges a critical gap in audio forgery detection and provides a foundation for safeguarding audio authenticity against emerging threats.

Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology (IN), Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat (IN), Amity University (AE), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detecting AI-Generated Speech Manipulation through CNN-BiLSTM Hybrid Networks — Sweta Tripathi, Rahul Dixit, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS