Quantitative Phase Imaging Denoising Based on Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models

Quantitative Phase Imaging (QPI) has been shown to complement established fluorescence microscopy as well as objective measurements of morphology and dynamics for cellular tissue studies. However, due to its inherent weak-signal measurements, the coherence of the laser light source, the roughness of the object under test or the complex scattering environment, QPI exhibits various types of complex noise, with Poisson-Gaussian noise and scattering noise being the main noise sources. In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the field of deep learning-based denoising algorithms, which have shown considerable efficacy in the denoising of individual noisy data. However, these algorithms have been observed to be less effective when confronted with other types of noisy data, and lack a unified model that can simultaneously remove complex noise from QPI. The present study proposes a QPI denoising approach based on the denoising diffusion probability model (DDPM). The denoising process of DDPM is comprised of two constituent parts: the forward process, which gradually adds standard Gaussian a priori noise to the original image until the image is completely random; and the reverse diffusion chain, which gradually recovers an undisturbed ‘clean’ image by inference from a given a priori noise, thus eliminating various types of complex noise in QPI. A comparative analysis was conducted between the conventional denoising approach based on BM3D and the deep network denoising algorithm with U-Net as the backbone, and the proposed method was evaluated through experimental validation using simulated Gaussian noise, scattering noise and fluorescence microscopy dataset (FMD). The experimental results demonstrate the superior denoising, detail restoration and generalization performance of the proposed method, signifying its significant potential for practical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lsp.2025.3582187
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Optical measurement and interference techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Phase Imaging Denoising Based on Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models

Songlin Zhuang, Jie Chen, Dawei Zhang, Yong Kong et al.
1 citations
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
Optical measurement and interference techniques
1.28
article

Quantitative Phase Imaging Denoising Based on Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models

Songlin Zhuang, Jie Chen, Dawei Zhang, Yong Kong, Keke Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Quantitative Phase Imaging (QPI) has been shown to complement established fluorescence microscopy as well as objective measurements of morphology and dynamics for cellular tissue studies. However, due to its inherent weak-signal measurements, the coherence of the laser light source, the roughness of the object under test or the complex scattering environment, QPI exhibits various types of complex noise, with Poisson-Gaussian noise and scattering noise being the main noise sources. In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the field of deep learning-based denoising algorithms, which have shown considerable efficacy in the denoising of individual noisy data. However, these algorithms have been observed to be less effective when confronted with other types of noisy data, and lack a unified model that can simultaneously remove complex noise from QPI. The present study proposes a QPI denoising approach based on the denoising diffusion probability model (DDPM). The denoising process of DDPM is comprised of two constituent parts: the forward process, which gradually adds standard Gaussian a priori noise to the original image until the image is completely random; and the reverse diffusion chain, which gradually recovers an undisturbed ‘clean’ image by inference from a given a priori noise, thus eliminating various types of complex noise in QPI. A comparative analysis was conducted between the conventional denoising approach based on BM3D and the deep network denoising algorithm with U-Net as the backbone, and the proposed method was evaluated through experimental validation using simulated Gaussian noise, scattering noise and fluorescence microscopy dataset (FMD). The experimental results demonstrate the superior denoising, detail restoration and generalization performance of the proposed method, signifying its significant potential for practical applications.

IEEE Signal Processing LettersVol. 32
Shanghai University of Engineering Science (CN), University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Optical measurement and interference techniques
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.