Evaluation of subretinally delivered Cas9 ribonucleoproteins in murine and porcine animal models highlights key considerations for therapeutic translation of genetic medicines

Genetic medicines, including CRISPR/Cas technologies, extend tremendous promise for addressing unmet medical need in inherited retinal disorders and other indications; however, there remain challenges for the development of therapeutics. Herein, we evaluate genome editing by engineered Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (eRNP) in vivo via subretinal administration using mouse and pig animal models. Subretinal administration of adenine base editor and double strand break-inducing Cas9 nuclease eRNPs mediate genome editing in both species. Editing occurs in retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptor cells, with favorable tolerability in both species. Using transgenic reporter strains, we determine that editing primarily occurs close to the site of administration, within the bleb region associated with subretinal injection. Our results show that subretinal administration of BE-eRNPs in mice mediates base editing of up to 12% of the total neural retina, with an average rate of 7% observed at the highest dose tested. In contrast, a substantially lower editing efficiency was observed in minipigs; even with direct quantification of only the treated region, a maximum base editing rate of 1.5%, with an average rate of <1%, was observed. Our data highlight the importance of species consideration in preclinical studies for the development of genetic medicines targeting the eye and provide an example of a lack of translation between small and larger animal models in the context of subretinal administration of Cas9 eRNPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317387
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of subretinally delivered Cas9 ribonucleoproteins in murine and porcine animal models highlights key considerations for therapeutic translation of genetic medicines

Peter B. Otoupal, Benjamin G. Gowen, Shannon McCawley, Jean L. Chan et al.
PLoS ONE
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Evaluation of subretinally delivered Cas9 ribonucleoproteins in murine and porcine animal models highlights key considerations for therapeutic translation of genetic medicines

Peter B. Otoupal, Benjamin G. Gowen, Shannon McCawley, Jean L. Chan, Bikash R. Pattnaik, Jonathan Wang, Spencer C. Wei, Pawan K. Shahi, Mary J. Janatpour, Pierre Boivin, Suhani Gupta, Mary Haak‐Frendscho, David M. Gamm, Jack Walleshauser, Aaron J. Cantor, Ashil Bans, Rina J. Mepani, Krishanu Saha, Vihasi Jani, Jieun Lee, Adam P. Silverman, Prachi Khekare, Kory Melton, Craig Soares, Weng In Leong, Radwan Kiwan
article en

Abstract

Genetic medicines, including CRISPR/Cas technologies, extend tremendous promise for addressing unmet medical need in inherited retinal disorders and other indications; however, there remain challenges for the development of therapeutics. Herein, we evaluate genome editing by engineered Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (eRNP) in vivo via subretinal administration using mouse and pig animal models. Subretinal administration of adenine base editor and double strand break-inducing Cas9 nuclease eRNPs mediate genome editing in both species. Editing occurs in retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptor cells, with favorable tolerability in both species. Using transgenic reporter strains, we determine that editing primarily occurs close to the site of administration, within the bleb region associated with subretinal injection. Our results show that subretinal administration of BE-eRNPs in mice mediates base editing of up to 12% of the total neural retina, with an average rate of 7% observed at the highest dose tested. In contrast, a substantially lower editing efficiency was observed in minipigs; even with direct quantification of only the treated region, a maximum base editing rate of 1.5%, with an average rate of <1%, was observed. Our data highlight the importance of species consideration in preclinical studies for the development of genetic medicines targeting the eye and provide an example of a lack of translation between small and larger animal models in the context of subretinal administration of Cas9 eRNPs.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(6)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery (US)
Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.