We Need to Talk About How We Compensate School Staff

Abstract Most of public school operational budgets are dedicated to compensating staff, and school staff are important for schools and students. Yet discussions about teacher shortages and teacher quality have tended to ignore many important aspects of school staff compensation beyond broad generalizations about average teacher salary levels. Consequently, these discussions are often muddled. In this essay, I highlight five important choices about school staff compensation faced by school district boards and other policymakers that are commonly neglected: (1) to hire more staff rather than to pay staff more(2) to replace salary with benefits(3) to backload rather than frontload compensation(4) to make compensation contingent on education(5) to compensate staff uniformly rather than to strategically differentiate compensation How school systems navigate these choices, and their trade-offs, has implications for their ability to recruit and retain high quality staff. Rather than taking for granted the decisions of stakeholders in the past - which has tended to obscure potential solutions to staff recruitment and retention problems – school leaders and policymakers should make these choices actively and explicitly on an ongoing basis. Additionally, researchers should do more to inform their decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education Finance and Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5406/30678560.50.1.14
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

We Need to Talk About How We Compensate School Staff

Paul Bruno
Journal of Education Finance and Law
School Choice and Performance
article

We Need to Talk About How We Compensate School Staff

Paul Bruno
article en

Abstract

Abstract Most of public school operational budgets are dedicated to compensating staff, and school staff are important for schools and students. Yet discussions about teacher shortages and teacher quality have tended to ignore many important aspects of school staff compensation beyond broad generalizations about average teacher salary levels. Consequently, these discussions are often muddled. In this essay, I highlight five important choices about school staff compensation faced by school district boards and other policymakers that are commonly neglected: (1) to hire more staff rather than to pay staff more(2) to replace salary with benefits(3) to backload rather than frontload compensation(4) to make compensation contingent on education(5) to compensate staff uniformly rather than to strategically differentiate compensation How school systems navigate these choices, and their trade-offs, has implications for their ability to recruit and retain high quality staff. Rather than taking for granted the decisions of stakeholders in the past - which has tended to obscure potential solutions to staff recruitment and retention problems – school leaders and policymakers should make these choices actively and explicitly on an ongoing basis. Additionally, researchers should do more to inform their decisions.

Journal of Education Finance and LawVol. 50(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.