Enhanced Protein Complex Prediction via Rosetta, AlphaFold, and Nondifferential Covalent Labeling Mass Spectrometry

Covalent labeling (CL) mass spectrometry is a versatile structural technique for elucidating structural information about proteins, including protein-protein complexes. When integrated with computational protein structure prediction, CL can generate accurate protein complex models. Structural insights from CL are more readily interpreted when differential data (e.g., monomer versus complex) are available, as changes in labeling can directly pinpoint interface residues. However, isolating and labeling monomeric subunits can be experimentally challenging, leading to the common scenario in which labeling data are available only in the complex form. However, importantly, nondifferential CL still encodes useful structural information that has yet to be utilized for automated protein complex prediction. In this work, we present a framework for using nondifferential CL in protein complex prediction. We introduced a new hydroxyl radical protein footprinting (HRPF)-derived scoring term that penalizes docked models based on their agreement with experimentally measured CL data. In a benchmark set, the best-scoring models showed an average root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) improvement of 4.6 Å when HRPF data was used. With the inclusion of CL data, four of the top-scoring complexes exhibited RMSDs below 5Å, whereas none did without it. This study demonstrates that CL can enhance protein complex prediction, even when only bound-state CL measurements are available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c02872
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced Protein Complex Prediction via Rosetta, AlphaFold, and Nondifferential Covalent Labeling Mass Spectrometry

Amy E. Blum, Zachary C. Drake, Steffen Lindert, Andrew Fowler
2 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.01
article

Enhanced Protein Complex Prediction via Rosetta, AlphaFold, and Nondifferential Covalent Labeling Mass Spectrometry

Amy E. Blum, Zachary C. Drake, Steffen Lindert, Andrew Fowler
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Covalent labeling (CL) mass spectrometry is a versatile structural technique for elucidating structural information about proteins, including protein-protein complexes. When integrated with computational protein structure prediction, CL can generate accurate protein complex models. Structural insights from CL are more readily interpreted when differential data (e.g., monomer versus complex) are available, as changes in labeling can directly pinpoint interface residues. However, isolating and labeling monomeric subunits can be experimentally challenging, leading to the common scenario in which labeling data are available only in the complex form. However, importantly, nondifferential CL still encodes useful structural information that has yet to be utilized for automated protein complex prediction. In this work, we present a framework for using nondifferential CL in protein complex prediction. We introduced a new hydroxyl radical protein footprinting (HRPF)-derived scoring term that penalizes docked models based on their agreement with experimentally measured CL data. In a benchmark set, the best-scoring models showed an average root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) improvement of 4.6 Å when HRPF data was used. With the inclusion of CL data, four of the top-scoring complexes exhibited RMSDs below 5Å, whereas none did without it. This study demonstrates that CL can enhance protein complex prediction, even when only bound-state CL measurements are available.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry BVol. 129(26)
The Ohio State University (US)
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.