Cultural Red Teaming: ARRG! and Creative Misuse of AI Systems

Abstract Artists have been using and misusing tools for decades. But the development and commercialization of diffusion-based image generation tools have challenged definitions of reappropriation, complicating the work of artists who use technology to provoke ideological critiques of technological power. In this article, three artists, operating as the Algorithmic Resistance Research Group (ARRG!), present a framework for the creative misuse of generative AI systems. By situating the lineage of technology-based art as “hacking” (and making as a form of inquiry), this article argues that misusing systems as a form of exploration within art making is a useful tool for critical AI discourse. Focusing on an exhibition of work presented at the hacker conference DEFCON 31 in 2023, the article examines creative misuse aligned with specific critiques. By using generative AI tools while rejecting their premises, artists can redefine creativity as a human endeavor, creating work that engages and shapes debate.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical AI
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703x-11700228
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural Red Teaming: ARRG! and Creative Misuse of AI Systems

Eryk Salvaggio, Caroline Sinders, Steph Maj Swanson
1 citations
Critical AI
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Cultural Red Teaming: ARRG! and Creative Misuse of AI Systems

Eryk Salvaggio, Caroline Sinders, Steph Maj Swanson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Artists have been using and misusing tools for decades. But the development and commercialization of diffusion-based image generation tools have challenged definitions of reappropriation, complicating the work of artists who use technology to provoke ideological critiques of technological power. In this article, three artists, operating as the Algorithmic Resistance Research Group (ARRG!), present a framework for the creative misuse of generative AI systems. By situating the lineage of technology-based art as “hacking” (and making as a form of inquiry), this article argues that misusing systems as a form of exploration within art making is a useful tool for critical AI discourse. Focusing on an exhibition of work presented at the hacker conference DEFCON 31 in 2023, the article examines creative misuse aligned with specific critiques. By using generative AI tools while rejecting their premises, artists can redefine creativity as a human endeavor, creating work that engages and shapes debate.

Critical AIVol. 3(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.