A Regression Model for Forecasting the Impact on Continuity Indicators and Its Influence on the Number of Critical Days

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of simple and multiple linear regression models in predicting the number of monthly critical days in an electric utility company in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, considering climatic variables as predictive factors. Method: The research used data on critical days of electrical interruption and climatic variables (precipitation, atmospheric pressure, temperature, winds, and humidity) collected between 2015 and 2020. Following a descriptive and correlation analysis, multiple linear regression models were applied, and the least significant variables were iteratively removed. Statistical tests assessed the normality, homoscedasticity, and independence of the residuals to ensure the model's adequacy. Results and Discussion: The adjusted models explained a low variability in critical days (adjusted R² up to 32%), with high error rates in predictions. The model identified a significant relationship between critical days and climatic variables (especially precipitation and winds) but with insufficient results for reliable forecasting. This suggests the need for more robust models and new variables to improve accuracy. Research Implications: Practical implications indicate the limitation of linear regression models for accurate predictions of critical days due to high data variability. Practically, it highlights the importance of seeking additional variables and alternative methodologies to support proactive planning and management of electric networks, while theoretical implications add a new perspective on the use of climatic variables as predictors of power interruptions, suggesting that while linear regression is common, it may have limitations. This encourages future investigations with nonlinear or hybrid models to improve predictions in this field. Originality/Value: The originality of the research lies in the attempt to directly correlate specific climatic indicators (precipitation, atmospheric pressure, and wind speed) with critical days, a topic still underexplored in energy reliability forecasts. This approach is innovative by investigating the impact of climatic variables on monthly interruptions, even recognizing that these linear regression models have limitations in capturing all variability of critical days. The relevance and value of the research are in highlighting how climatic factors can directly influence the reliability of the power grid, especially for energy distributors facing frequent interruptions due to adverse climatic events.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v19n6-081
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Regression Model for Forecasting the Impact on Continuity Indicators and Its Influence on the Number of Critical Days

Thiago Eliandro de Oliveira Gomes, Vinícius Jacques Garcia, André Ross Borniatti
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

A Regression Model for Forecasting the Impact on Continuity Indicators and Its Influence on the Number of Critical Days

Thiago Eliandro de Oliveira Gomes, Vinícius Jacques Garcia, André Ross Borniatti
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of simple and multiple linear regression models in predicting the number of monthly critical days in an electric utility company in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, considering climatic variables as predictive factors. Method: The research used data on critical days of electrical interruption and climatic variables (precipitation, atmospheric pressure, temperature, winds, and humidity) collected between 2015 and 2020. Following a descriptive and correlation analysis, multiple linear regression models were applied, and the least significant variables were iteratively removed. Statistical tests assessed the normality, homoscedasticity, and independence of the residuals to ensure the model's adequacy. Results and Discussion: The adjusted models explained a low variability in critical days (adjusted R² up to 32%), with high error rates in predictions. The model identified a significant relationship between critical days and climatic variables (especially precipitation and winds) but with insufficient results for reliable forecasting. This suggests the need for more robust models and new variables to improve accuracy. Research Implications: Practical implications indicate the limitation of linear regression models for accurate predictions of critical days due to high data variability. Practically, it highlights the importance of seeking additional variables and alternative methodologies to support proactive planning and management of electric networks, while theoretical implications add a new perspective on the use of climatic variables as predictors of power interruptions, suggesting that while linear regression is common, it may have limitations. This encourages future investigations with nonlinear or hybrid models to improve predictions in this field. Originality/Value: The originality of the research lies in the attempt to directly correlate specific climatic indicators (precipitation, atmospheric pressure, and wind speed) with critical days, a topic still underexplored in energy reliability forecasts. This approach is innovative by investigating the impact of climatic variables on monthly interruptions, even recognizing that these linear regression models have limitations in capturing all variability of critical days. The relevance and value of the research are in highlighting how climatic factors can directly influence the reliability of the power grid, especially for energy distributors facing frequent interruptions due to adverse climatic events.

Revista de Gestão Social e AmbientalVol. 19(6)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.