Synthetically Assisted Conservation and the Application of Emerging Biological Technologies for the Protection of Biodiversity

ABSTRACT New tools of synthetic biology that enable precise manipulation of genomes, metabolic pathways, and ecosystems present new opportunities, risks, ethical dilemmas, and responsibilities for stewards of biodiversity. We argue that the risks and benefits of synthetic biology for use in biodiversity conservation, which we term “synthetically assisted conservation,” can be better understood, evaluated, and regulated by precisely defining the techniques in relation to well‐established and regulated conservation frameworks: conservation translocation and integrated pest management. Synthetically assisted conservation translocation could include the release of genetically modified organisms for in situ conservation of genes or restoration of ecological functions, while a synthetically assisted application of integrated pest management could involve using genetic modifications propagated through gene drives to remove invasive species. Contextualizing the range of techniques as expansions of these frameworks clarifies how new approaches may impact conservation, facilitating risk assessment and responsible implementation. Decision‐making may be informed by existing policy guidance in accordance with national and international regulations on conservation translocation and integrated pest management. Nevertheless, additional policy and evaluative guidelines are needed to keep pace with rapid technological growth and novel issues such as the release of genes (e.g., in pollen or marine‐dispersed gametes) separate from live organisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Letters
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13114
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synthetically Assisted Conservation and the Application of Emerging Biological Technologies for the Protection of Biodiversity

Jedediah F. Brodie, Blake Wiedenheft, Sara Dunn, J. Helm et al.
1 citations
Conservation Letters
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
2.31
article

Synthetically Assisted Conservation and the Application of Emerging Biological Technologies for the Protection of Biodiversity

Jedediah F. Brodie, Blake Wiedenheft, Sara Dunn, J. Helm, Ronald Sandler, Kent H. Redford, Chad R. Schultz, Michael K. Schwartz, Melanie Mark‐Shadbolt, Axel Moehrenschlager, William A.C. Gendron, Amanda S. Emmel, W. Sebastian Kamau
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT New tools of synthetic biology that enable precise manipulation of genomes, metabolic pathways, and ecosystems present new opportunities, risks, ethical dilemmas, and responsibilities for stewards of biodiversity. We argue that the risks and benefits of synthetic biology for use in biodiversity conservation, which we term “synthetically assisted conservation,” can be better understood, evaluated, and regulated by precisely defining the techniques in relation to well‐established and regulated conservation frameworks: conservation translocation and integrated pest management. Synthetically assisted conservation translocation could include the release of genetically modified organisms for in situ conservation of genes or restoration of ecological functions, while a synthetically assisted application of integrated pest management could involve using genetic modifications propagated through gene drives to remove invasive species. Contextualizing the range of techniques as expansions of these frameworks clarifies how new approaches may impact conservation, facilitating risk assessment and responsible implementation. Decision‐making may be informed by existing policy guidance in accordance with national and international regulations on conservation translocation and integrated pest management. Nevertheless, additional policy and evaluative guidelines are needed to keep pace with rapid technological growth and novel issues such as the release of genes (e.g., in pollen or marine‐dispersed gametes) separate from live organisms.

Conservation LettersVol. 18(3)
Northeastern University (US), US Forest Service (US), Panthera Corporation (US), Montana State University (US), University of New England (US), University of California San Diego (US), Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (MY), Rocky Mountain Research Station (US), Rocky Mountain Research (United States) (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), University of Montana (US), Colorado State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Montana, Montana State University, U.S. Forest Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.