A Novel 3D-Printed Mouse Model for Surgical Training: Multicenter Construct, Face, and Content Validation Study

Advancements in laboratory animal training increasingly incorporate technological innovations aiming to better align training standards with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement). This trend is shifting away from traditional reliance on live animals and cadavers toward simulation-based methods. This study introduces and assesses the validity of a novel 3D-printed rodent surgical simulator designed for the practice and training of basic rodent surgical skills. To evaluate its potential to partially replace animal use, refine rodent surgical training, and reduce the number of animals needed, a multicenter validation study across 5 European and US research academic centers was conducted. The study assessed the simulator's face, content, and construct validity, involving participants inexperienced and experts in rodent surgery. The construct validity was evaluated through task completion times and blinded quality assessments across multiple training iterations. The results revealed that inexperienced participants demonstrated significant improvements in both speed and quality of surgical tasks with repeated simulator use, eventually reaching performance levels comparable to experts' initial attempts. Expert participants consistently outperformed the inexperienced group. Face and content validity were supported by postuse surveys, with high ratings from both groups regarding the simulator's anatomic realism and its perceived usefulness for the acquisition and development of fundamental surgical skills. Overall, the findings of this study support that this 3D-printed rodent surgical simulator offers a realistic, effective, and ethically sound alternative for basic rodent surgical skills training and competency assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30802/aalas-jaalas-25-064
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel 3D-Printed Mouse Model for Surgical Training: Multicenter Construct, Face, and Content Validation Study

Nina Eva Trimmel, Regina Rumpel, Felix Gantenbein, Diego Celdran‐Bonafonte et al.
1 links
Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

A Novel 3D-Printed Mouse Model for Surgical Training: Multicenter Construct, Face, and Content Validation Study

Nina Eva Trimmel, Regina Rumpel, Felix Gantenbein, Diego Celdran‐Bonafonte, Daniel Pérez
article en

Abstract

Advancements in laboratory animal training increasingly incorporate technological innovations aiming to better align training standards with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement). This trend is shifting away from traditional reliance on live animals and cadavers toward simulation-based methods. This study introduces and assesses the validity of a novel 3D-printed rodent surgical simulator designed for the practice and training of basic rodent surgical skills. To evaluate its potential to partially replace animal use, refine rodent surgical training, and reduce the number of animals needed, a multicenter validation study across 5 European and US research academic centers was conducted. The study assessed the simulator's face, content, and construct validity, involving participants inexperienced and experts in rodent surgery. The construct validity was evaluated through task completion times and blinded quality assessments across multiple training iterations. The results revealed that inexperienced participants demonstrated significant improvements in both speed and quality of surgical tasks with repeated simulator use, eventually reaching performance levels comparable to experts' initial attempts. Expert participants consistently outperformed the inexperienced group. Face and content validity were supported by postuse surveys, with high ratings from both groups regarding the simulator's anatomic realism and its perceived usefulness for the acquisition and development of fundamental surgical skills. Overall, the findings of this study support that this 3D-printed rodent surgical simulator offers a realistic, effective, and ethically sound alternative for basic rodent surgical skills training and competency assessment.

Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal ScienceVol. 64(5)
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), University of Arizona (US), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), University of Zurich (CH), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.