Cross-correlating the EMU Pilot Survey 1 with CMB lensing: Constraints on cosmology and galaxy bias with harmonic-space power spectra

Abstract We measured the harmonic-space power spectrum of Galaxy clustering auto-correlation from the Evolutionary Map of the Universe Pilot Survey 1 data (EMU PS1) and its cross-correlation with the lensing convergence map of cosmic microwave background (CMB) from Planck Public Release 4 at the linear scale range from $\ell=2$ to 500. We applied two flux density cuts at $0.18$ and $0.4$ mJy on the radio galaxies observed at 944MHz and considered two source detection algorithms. We found the auto-correlation measurements from the two algorithms at the 0.18 mJy cut to deviate for $\ell\gtrsim250$ due to the different criteria assumed on the source detection and decided to ignore data above this scale. We report a cross-correlation detection of EMU PS1 with CMB lensing at $\sim$ 5.5 $\sigma$ , irrespective of flux density cut. In our theoretical modelling we considered the SKADS and T-RECS redshift distribution simulation models that yield consistent results, a linear and a non-linear matter power spectrum, and two linear galaxy bias models. That is a constant redshift-independent galaxy bias $b(z)=b_g$ and a constant amplitude galaxy bias $b(z)=b_g/D(z)$ . By fixing a cosmology model and considering a non-linear matter power spectrum with SKADS , we measured a constant galaxy bias at $0.18$ mJy ( $0.4$ mJy) with $b_g=2.32^{+0.41}_{-0.33}$ ( $2.18^{+0.17}_{-0.25}$ ) and a constant amplitude bias with $b_g=1.72^{+0.31}_{-0.21}$ ( $1.78^{+0.22}_{-0.15}$ ). When $\sigma_8$ is a free parameter for the same models at $0.18$ mJy ( $0.4$ mJy) with the constant model we found $\sigma_8=0.68^{+0.16}_{-0.14}$ ( $0.82\pm0.10$ ), while with the constant amplitude model we measured $\sigma_8=0.61^{+0.18}_{-0.20}$ ( $0.78^{+0.11}_{-0.09}$ ), respectively. Our results agree at $1\sigma$ with the measurements from Planck CMB and the weak lensing surveys and also show the potential of cosmology studies with future radio continuum survey data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2025.10033
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-correlating the EMU Pilot Survey 1 with CMB lensing: Constraints on cosmology and galaxy bias with harmonic-space power spectra

Andrew Hopkins, R. P. Norris, Catherine Laura Hale, Maciej Bilicki et al.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
article

Cross-correlating the EMU Pilot Survey 1 with CMB lensing: Constraints on cosmology and galaxy bias with harmonic-space power spectra

Andrew Hopkins, R. P. Norris, Catherine Laura Hale, Maciej Bilicki, Benedict Bahr-Kalus, David Parkinson, J. Asorey, N. Gupta, S. Camera, K Tanidis, Chandra Shekhar Saraf
article en

Abstract

Abstract We measured the harmonic-space power spectrum of Galaxy clustering auto-correlation from the Evolutionary Map of the Universe Pilot Survey 1 data (EMU PS1) and its cross-correlation with the lensing convergence map of cosmic microwave background (CMB) from Planck Public Release 4 at the linear scale range from $\ell=2$ to 500. We applied two flux density cuts at $0.18$ and $0.4$ mJy on the radio galaxies observed at 944MHz and considered two source detection algorithms. We found the auto-correlation measurements from the two algorithms at the 0.18 mJy cut to deviate for $\ell\gtrsim250$ due to the different criteria assumed on the source detection and decided to ignore data above this scale. We report a cross-correlation detection of EMU PS1 with CMB lensing at $\sim$ 5.5 $\sigma$ , irrespective of flux density cut. In our theoretical modelling we considered the SKADS and T-RECS redshift distribution simulation models that yield consistent results, a linear and a non-linear matter power spectrum, and two linear galaxy bias models. That is a constant redshift-independent galaxy bias $b(z)=b_g$ and a constant amplitude galaxy bias $b(z)=b_g/D(z)$ . By fixing a cosmology model and considering a non-linear matter power spectrum with SKADS , we measured a constant galaxy bias at $0.18$ mJy ( $0.4$ mJy) with $b_g=2.32^{+0.41}_{-0.33}$ ( $2.18^{+0.17}_{-0.25}$ ) and a constant amplitude bias with $b_g=1.72^{+0.31}_{-0.21}$ ( $1.78^{+0.22}_{-0.15}$ ). When $\sigma_8$ is a free parameter for the same models at $0.18$ mJy ( $0.4$ mJy) with the constant model we found $\sigma_8=0.68^{+0.16}_{-0.14}$ ( $0.82\pm0.10$ ), while with the constant amplitude model we measured $\sigma_8=0.61^{+0.18}_{-0.20}$ ( $0.78^{+0.11}_{-0.09}$ ), respectively. Our results agree at $1\sigma$ with the measurements from Planck CMB and the weak lensing surveys and also show the potential of cosmology studies with future radio continuum survey data.

Publications of the Astronomical Society of AustraliaVol. 42
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (IT), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KR), Center for Theoretical Physics (PL), University of Oxford (GB), Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino (IT), Astronomy and Space (AU), University of Turin (IT), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.