Refining satellite laser altimetry geolocation through full-waveform radiative transfer modeling and matching

Advances in geolocation accuracy for spaceborne laser altimetry data are critical for numerous applications. Existing methods often address the problem on a global scale, primarily relying on ground returns and overlooking the effects of vegetation canopy, which can lead to inaccuracies, especially when integrating these data with other georeferenced datasets. We developed a novel, site-focused approach to evaluate and correct geolocation errors in full-waveform spaceborne laser altimeter data using simulated data from the 3D discrete anisotropic radiative transfer (DART) model. Our analysis operates at the scale of a LiDAR footprint, employing waveform matching that effectively accounts for both vegetation and ground returns across various forest types. We used DART to (i) prepare realistic 3D vegetation scenes reconstructed from dense ( > 20 pt / m 2 ), small footprint airborne LiDAR data, and (ii) simulate Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) waveforms within these scenes. Our approach determines the “true” GEDI footprint positions by maximizing the similarity between simulated and observed GEDI full-waveforms within a local search area. We evaluated this method across various sites with different forest canopy types, finding strong correlations between simulated and observed GEDI waveforms ( r 2 ∈ [ 0 . 94 , 0 . 99 ] ) and root mean square errors (RMSE) ∈ [ 0 . 14 , 0 . 63 ] . Random GEDI geolocation errors ranged from 5-10 m, and systematic errors were less than 8 m, within the GEDI product specification. Waveform matching was most successful for complex waveforms over heterogeneous, open canopies, and less effective for homogeneous, closed canopies over flat terrain. Our approach offers improved performance, with lower RMSE and higher correlation, over existing ALS-basedmethods. These advances support spaceborne data fusion through precise integration of vertical vegetation structure profiles from laser altimetry with horizontal vegetation structure of canopy and ground surface topography. • Radiative transfer modeling and full-waveform matching offer improved geolocation correction. • Individual GEDI footprint geolocation error varies in both magnitude and direction. • Forest canopy type affects geolocation correction quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science of Remote Sensing
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2025.100248
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refining satellite laser altimetry geolocation through full-waveform radiative transfer modeling and matching

Christopher S.R. Neigh, Paul Montesano, Ameni Mkaouar, Tiangang Yin et al.
1 citations
Science of Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.80
article

Refining satellite laser altimetry geolocation through full-waveform radiative transfer modeling and matching

Christopher S.R. Neigh, Paul Montesano, Ameni Mkaouar, Tiangang Yin, Abdelaziz Kallel, Jean‐Philippe Gastellu‐Etchegorry, David Shean, Rodrigo Viera Leite
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Advances in geolocation accuracy for spaceborne laser altimetry data are critical for numerous applications. Existing methods often address the problem on a global scale, primarily relying on ground returns and overlooking the effects of vegetation canopy, which can lead to inaccuracies, especially when integrating these data with other georeferenced datasets. We developed a novel, site-focused approach to evaluate and correct geolocation errors in full-waveform spaceborne laser altimeter data using simulated data from the 3D discrete anisotropic radiative transfer (DART) model. Our analysis operates at the scale of a LiDAR footprint, employing waveform matching that effectively accounts for both vegetation and ground returns across various forest types. We used DART to (i) prepare realistic 3D vegetation scenes reconstructed from dense ( > 20 pt / m 2 ), small footprint airborne LiDAR data, and (ii) simulate Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) waveforms within these scenes. Our approach determines the “true” GEDI footprint positions by maximizing the similarity between simulated and observed GEDI full-waveforms within a local search area. We evaluated this method across various sites with different forest canopy types, finding strong correlations between simulated and observed GEDI waveforms ( r 2 ∈ [ 0 . 94 , 0 . 99 ] ) and root mean square errors (RMSE) ∈ [ 0 . 14 , 0 . 63 ] . Random GEDI geolocation errors ranged from 5-10 m, and systematic errors were less than 8 m, within the GEDI product specification. Waveform matching was most successful for complex waveforms over heterogeneous, open canopies, and less effective for homogeneous, closed canopies over flat terrain. Our approach offers improved performance, with lower RMSE and higher correlation, over existing ALS-basedmethods. These advances support spaceborne data fusion through precise integration of vertical vegetation structure profiles from laser altimetry with horizontal vegetation structure of canopy and ground surface topography. • Radiative transfer modeling and full-waveform matching offer improved geolocation correction. • Individual GEDI footprint geolocation error varies in both magnitude and direction. • Forest canopy type affects geolocation correction quality.

Science of Remote SensingVol. 12
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), University of Washington (US), Centre d'Études Spatiales de la Biosphère (FR), Digital Research Centre of Sfax (TN), Adnet Systems (United States) (US), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Oak Ridge Associated Universities
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.