Investigation of Nurse's Pressure Ulcer Management Self‐Efficacy Status and Influencing Factors: A Cross‐Sectional Study

This study aims to examine the self-efficacy levels of nurses in the management of pressure ulcers (PUs) and the demographic and professional factors affecting this. This cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted with 436 nurses. Data were collected between January and April 2024, using the Nurse Identification Form and the Pressure Ulcer Management Self-Efficacy Scale (PUM-SES). In the study, the total mean score of the PUM-SES was found to be 58.77 ± 18.07 (min-max: 0-100). The mean scores of the sub-dimensions of the scale were assessment 57.54 ± 20.60, planning 59.14 ± 21.15, supervision 57.16 ± 21.86, decision making 60.02 ± 19.19 (min-max: 0-100). In addition, it was observed that the total scores of the PUM-SES were significantly higher for nurses who were 34 years old and older, had worked in the unit for 3 years or more and worked in intensive care clinics. Findings showed that nurses generally had a moderate PUM-SES score. Sociodemographic variables explained only 3.9% of the total variance. Age was significant in the sub-dimensions of surveillance (β = 0.241, p = 0.001) and decision-making (β = 0.162, p = 0.03); while the unit worked had a significant and negative effect on all sub-dimensions and the total score (β = -0.159, p = 0.001). The results obtained suggest that professional experience and the working environment may have an effect on the cognitive competence of nurses. Therefore, it is recommended that training programs be developed to support nurses' decision-making processes and professional competence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Wound Journal
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70714
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of Nurse's Pressure Ulcer Management Self‐Efficacy Status and Influencing Factors: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Gülistan Yurdagül
1 citations
International Wound Journal
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
5.77
article

Investigation of Nurse's Pressure Ulcer Management Self‐Efficacy Status and Influencing Factors: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Gülistan Yurdagül
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to examine the self-efficacy levels of nurses in the management of pressure ulcers (PUs) and the demographic and professional factors affecting this. This cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted with 436 nurses. Data were collected between January and April 2024, using the Nurse Identification Form and the Pressure Ulcer Management Self-Efficacy Scale (PUM-SES). In the study, the total mean score of the PUM-SES was found to be 58.77 ± 18.07 (min-max: 0-100). The mean scores of the sub-dimensions of the scale were assessment 57.54 ± 20.60, planning 59.14 ± 21.15, supervision 57.16 ± 21.86, decision making 60.02 ± 19.19 (min-max: 0-100). In addition, it was observed that the total scores of the PUM-SES were significantly higher for nurses who were 34 years old and older, had worked in the unit for 3 years or more and worked in intensive care clinics. Findings showed that nurses generally had a moderate PUM-SES score. Sociodemographic variables explained only 3.9% of the total variance. Age was significant in the sub-dimensions of surveillance (β = 0.241, p = 0.001) and decision-making (β = 0.162, p = 0.03); while the unit worked had a significant and negative effect on all sub-dimensions and the total score (β = -0.159, p = 0.001). The results obtained suggest that professional experience and the working environment may have an effect on the cognitive competence of nurses. Therefore, it is recommended that training programs be developed to support nurses' decision-making processes and professional competence.

International Wound JournalVol. 22(7)
Kilis 7 Aralık University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.