The medieval reception of the geography of Orosius

Abstract This article traces the reception of the description of the known world that opens Paulus Orosius’ Historiae, from its wide circulation in the early Middle Ages to its marginalization by first-generation humanists in the fourteenth century. Particular attention is given to two roughly contemporaneous translations of the Historiae—the Old English Orosius, and the Arabic Kitāb Hurūshiyūsh—which reworked and supplemented Orosius’ geography in innovative ways. A concluding section argues that it is on mappae mundi that the most substantial engagement with the convergence of geography and history, implicit at the opening of Orosius’ work, took place.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bics/qbaf009
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The medieval reception of the geography of Orosius

Alfred Hiatt
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

The medieval reception of the geography of Orosius

Alfred Hiatt
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article traces the reception of the description of the known world that opens Paulus Orosius’ Historiae, from its wide circulation in the early Middle Ages to its marginalization by first-generation humanists in the fourteenth century. Particular attention is given to two roughly contemporaneous translations of the Historiae—the Old English Orosius, and the Arabic Kitāb Hurūshiyūsh—which reworked and supplemented Orosius’ geography in innovative ways. A concluding section argues that it is on mappae mundi that the most substantial engagement with the convergence of geography and history, implicit at the opening of Orosius’ work, took place.

Bulletin of the Institute of Classical StudiesVol. 68(1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.