Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

While KOOS, JR improvement correlated with satisfaction, achieving MCID was not a reliable predictor. Preoperative factors, including VR-12 mental component scores, may better identify patients likely to be satisfied post-TKA. Further research on larger cohorts is needed to refine PROM-based eligibility criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroplasty Today
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2025.101751
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Alexis Alva, George N. Guild, Joseph M. Schwab, Thomas L. Bradbury et al.
1 citations
Arthroplasty Today
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
2.01
article

Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Alexis Alva, George N. Guild, Joseph M. Schwab, Thomas L. Bradbury, Natalie L Gresham, Anita Alex Bradham
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While KOOS, JR improvement correlated with satisfaction, achieving MCID was not a reliable predictor. Preoperative factors, including VR-12 mental component scores, may better identify patients likely to be satisfied post-TKA. Further research on larger cohorts is needed to refine PROM-based eligibility criteria.

Arthroplasty TodayVol. 34
Northside Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.