Carbon balance in dairy cattle silvopastoral production systems in Colombia’s Andean-Amazon region

Abstract Silvopastoral systems (SPS) are recognized for their potential to sequester carbon (C) and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in livestock production. However, the extent to which small-scale dairy farms in the Andean region can offset emissions through SPS remains unclear. This study assessed the C capture of SPS to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in small-scale dairy farms in Colombia's Andean-Amazon region. The average annual carbon increment (AACI) in living biomass (above and below ground) was evaluated in woodlots (WL), live fences (LF), and topsoil of pastures (TP) at plot and farm levels. The carbon footprint (CFP) was calculated using a cradle-to-gate approach with biophysical allocation for fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) and expressed per product (MgCO 2 -eq MgFPCM⁻ 1 ) and area (MgCO 2 -eq·yr⁻ 1 ha⁻ 1 ) across 30 farms categorized by high, medium, and low SPS coverage. At plot level, AACI values were 4.54 ± 0.57 Mg·C·ha⁻ 1 ·yr⁻ 1 (LF), 3.20 ± 0.61 Mg·C·ha⁻ 1 ·yr⁻ 1 (WL), and 0.24 ± 0.08 Mg·C·ha⁻ 1 ·yr⁻ 1 (TP). At farm-level AACI was 4.43 ± 0.96, 1.28 ± 0.41, and 0.24 ± 0.08 Mg·C·ha⁻ 1 ·yr⁻ 1 for high, medium, and low SPS coverages respectively. Between 78 and 86% of AACI was attributed to Eucalyptus globulus (LF). CFP per product averaged 1.24 ± 0.16 MgCO 2 -eq MgFPCM⁻ 1 . Total emissions per farm averaged 28.27 ± 2.58 MgCO 2 -eq·yr⁻ 1 and per area 3.35 ± 0.32 MgCO 2 -eq·yr⁻ 1 ha⁻ 1 , with no differences across SPS coverages. Carbon balance was negative regardless of SPS coverage. The mitigation potential of SPS were 63%, 26%, and 4% for high, medium, and low SPS coverage. The required area to offset emissions ranged from 11.5 ha⁻ 1 considering the soil AACI to 1.2–10.2 ha⁻ 1 based on the AACI of SPS. Small dairy farms (9.11 ± 0.75 ha −1 ) in the Andean-Amazon region can mitigate total emissions using a SPS coverage over 13% together with optimized feeding practices, lactation and weaning periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agroforestry Systems
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01233-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon balance in dairy cattle silvopastoral production systems in Colombia’s Andean-Amazon region

Adriana del Socorro Guerra-Acosta, Edwin Castro-Rincón, Adrián Antonio Riascos Salcedo, Karol Henry Mavisoy Muchavisoy et al.
1 citations
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
6.43
article

Carbon balance in dairy cattle silvopastoral production systems in Colombia’s Andean-Amazon region

Adriana del Socorro Guerra-Acosta, Edwin Castro-Rincón, Adrián Antonio Riascos Salcedo, Karol Henry Mavisoy Muchavisoy, Adrián Rolando Riascos Vallejos, André M. Almeida, David Fangueiro, Juan Pablo Narváez-Herrera, Lorieth Rosas, Disney Magali Aguillon Alban, Carlos Chingal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Silvopastoral systems (SPS) are recognized for their potential to sequester carbon (C) and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in livestock production. However, the extent to which small-scale dairy farms in the Andean region can offset emissions through SPS remains unclear. This study assessed the C capture of SPS to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in small-scale dairy farms in Colombia's Andean-Amazon region. The average annual carbon increment (AACI) in living biomass (above and below ground) was evaluated in woodlots (WL), live fences (LF), and topsoil of pastures (TP) at plot and farm levels. The carbon footprint (CFP) was calculated using a cradle-to-gate approach with biophysical allocation for fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) and expressed per product (MgCO 2 -eq MgFPCM⁻ 1 ) and area (MgCO 2 -eq·yr⁻ 1 ha⁻ 1 ) across 30 farms categorized by high, medium, and low SPS coverage. At plot level, AACI values were 4.54 ± 0.57 Mg·C·ha⁻ 1 ·yr⁻ 1 (LF), 3.20 ± 0.61 Mg·C·ha⁻ 1 ·yr⁻ 1 (WL), and 0.24 ± 0.08 Mg·C·ha⁻ 1 ·yr⁻ 1 (TP). At farm-level AACI was 4.43 ± 0.96, 1.28 ± 0.41, and 0.24 ± 0.08 Mg·C·ha⁻ 1 ·yr⁻ 1 for high, medium, and low SPS coverages respectively. Between 78 and 86% of AACI was attributed to Eucalyptus globulus (LF). CFP per product averaged 1.24 ± 0.16 MgCO 2 -eq MgFPCM⁻ 1 . Total emissions per farm averaged 28.27 ± 2.58 MgCO 2 -eq·yr⁻ 1 and per area 3.35 ± 0.32 MgCO 2 -eq·yr⁻ 1 ha⁻ 1 , with no differences across SPS coverages. Carbon balance was negative regardless of SPS coverage. The mitigation potential of SPS were 63%, 26%, and 4% for high, medium, and low SPS coverage. The required area to offset emissions ranged from 11.5 ha⁻ 1 considering the soil AACI to 1.2–10.2 ha⁻ 1 based on the AACI of SPS. Small dairy farms (9.11 ± 0.75 ha −1 ) in the Andean-Amazon region can mitigate total emissions using a SPS coverage over 13% together with optimized feeding practices, lactation and weaning periods.

Agroforestry SystemsVol. 99(6)
University of Lisbon (PT), National Training Service (CO), Red de Investigación en Sida (ES), Colombian Corporation for Agricultural Research - AGROSAVIA (CO)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
6.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.