See Me, Judge Me, Pay Me: Gendered Effort Moralization in Work and Care

Displaying high effort at work is rewarded with more positive moral judgments (effort moralization effect) and increased cooperation partner attractiveness. This holds, even if higher effort is unrelated to better performance. Yet, current evidence is exclusively based on males, mostly situated in the work context. This prohibits generalization to the full population and neglects critical aspects of our lives, such as the care context (e.g., unpaid care for elders). To address this gap, we conducted two Studies (Study 1: Nwork = 859, Study 2: Ncare = 701) testing the effect between genders and contexts—work and care. Study materials featured two actors performing the same task, requiring different levels of effort (high/low). Participants rated the actor’s morality, suggested hourly salary, and reported their satisfaction to cooperate with them as assigned partners. The results confirmed the effort moralization effect in work contexts but were mixed for the care context, potentially due to the inherently moral nature of the behavior. There were no gender differences, supporting the demographic generalizability of the effect. Effort did not influence suggested pay, and participants expressed greater satisfaction with low-effort actors as assigned cooperation partners. While further research is needed to explore the boundary conditions of effort moralization in different contexts, the findings support its role as a robust heuristic for moral judgment in the work context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Collabra Psychology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.140759
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

See Me, Judge Me, Pay Me: Gendered Effort Moralization in Work and Care

Tassilo Tissot, Thea Fischer, Leopold Helmut Otto Roth, Sophie Charlotte Masak
1 citations
Collabra Psychology
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
article

See Me, Judge Me, Pay Me: Gendered Effort Moralization in Work and Care

Tassilo Tissot, Thea Fischer, Leopold Helmut Otto Roth, Sophie Charlotte Masak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Displaying high effort at work is rewarded with more positive moral judgments (effort moralization effect) and increased cooperation partner attractiveness. This holds, even if higher effort is unrelated to better performance. Yet, current evidence is exclusively based on males, mostly situated in the work context. This prohibits generalization to the full population and neglects critical aspects of our lives, such as the care context (e.g., unpaid care for elders). To address this gap, we conducted two Studies (Study 1: Nwork = 859, Study 2: Ncare = 701) testing the effect between genders and contexts—work and care. Study materials featured two actors performing the same task, requiring different levels of effort (high/low). Participants rated the actor’s morality, suggested hourly salary, and reported their satisfaction to cooperate with them as assigned partners. The results confirmed the effort moralization effect in work contexts but were mixed for the care context, potentially due to the inherently moral nature of the behavior. There were no gender differences, supporting the demographic generalizability of the effect. Effort did not influence suggested pay, and participants expressed greater satisfaction with low-effort actors as assigned cooperation partners. While further research is needed to explore the boundary conditions of effort moralization in different contexts, the findings support its role as a robust heuristic for moral judgment in the work context.

Collabra PsychologyVol. 11(1)
University of Vienna (AT), Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Universität Wien
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.