Predictive Modeling for Casting Impurity Defects Using CNN-Random Forest Fusion

In the abstract, The present study focuses on the thorough evaluation of an automated learning model’s performance throughout different fault classes. The model is developed and tested using a dataset containing various impurity faults found in casting operations. Precision, recall, F1-Score, assistance, Support Proportion, or overall accuracy are used to assess each defect class, which includes Cold Shut, Hot Tear and Cracking, Misrun, Sand Inclusion, Dross, Blowholes or Porosity. The model regularly achieves high precision, and recall, with F1-Score values of above 97% across all fault classes. The confusion matrix also provides an extensive description of true positive, erroneous positive, false negative, and actual negative predictions, demonstrating the model’s ability to classify defects. The total precision of 99% demonstrates the model’s ability to effectively identify impurity flaws. The abstract design emphasises the suggested model’s promising performance, making it an important tool for assessing quality in casting operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccccm61016.2024.11039963
Primary Topic
Metallurgy and Material Forming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Modeling for Casting Impurity Defects Using CNN-Random Forest Fusion

Priyanshi Aggarwal, Ricky Rajora, Deepak Banerjee, Mukesh Singh et al.
Metallurgy and Material Forming
article

Predictive Modeling for Casting Impurity Defects Using CNN-Random Forest Fusion

Priyanshi Aggarwal, Ricky Rajora, Deepak Banerjee, Mukesh Singh, G Sunil
article en

Abstract

In the abstract, The present study focuses on the thorough evaluation of an automated learning model’s performance throughout different fault classes. The model is developed and tested using a dataset containing various impurity faults found in casting operations. Precision, recall, F1-Score, assistance, Support Proportion, or overall accuracy are used to assess each defect class, which includes Cold Shut, Hot Tear and Cracking, Misrun, Sand Inclusion, Dross, Blowholes or Porosity. The model regularly achieves high precision, and recall, with F1-Score values of above 97% across all fault classes. The confusion matrix also provides an extensive description of true positive, erroneous positive, false negative, and actual negative predictions, demonstrating the model’s ability to classify defects. The total precision of 99% demonstrates the model’s ability to effectively identify impurity flaws. The abstract design emphasises the suggested model’s promising performance, making it an important tool for assessing quality in casting operations.

Graphic Era University (IN), Chitkara University (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Metallurgy and Material Forming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Predictive Modeling for Casting Impurity Defects Using CNN-Random Forest Fusion — Priyanshi Aggarwal, Ricky Rajora, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS