Superhydrophobicity Effects on Spheroid Formation, Structure, and Viability on Co-Culture Conditions

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models more accurately simulate the in vivo tissue environments as compared to conventional two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cultures. Among these, spheroid cultures are particularly valuable for pharmaceutical research, as they allow for the study of tumor growth, drug responses, and cell-cell interactions in a physiologically relevant manner. Superhydrophobic surfaces (SHSs) have shown a promise in enhancing spheroid formation by reducing cell-substrate adhesion and promoting cell-cell aggregation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two different SHS coatings (SHS1: fluorinated; SHS2: silicone-based) in generating co-culture spheroids composed of non-tumoral fibroblasts (3T3) and tumoral epidermoid carcinoma cells (A431), thereby mimicking aspects of the tumor microenvironment. <b>Methods:</b> Co-cultures of 3T3 and A431 cells were seeded at varying ratios onto SHS1 and SHS2 substrates to assess their ability to support 3D spheroid formation. Spheroids were characterized by measurements of circularity and size distribution, viability through live/dead staining, and surface topography using 3D profilometry. <b>Results:</b> Spheroid formation was significantly influenced by both the surface properties and the fibroblast-to-carcinoma cell ratio. The fluorinated SHS1 surface facilitated superior cell viability and promoted the formation of well-rounded, uniform spheroids. In contrast, the silicone-based SHS2 surface resulted in less defined spheroidal structures and lower overall viability. Profilometry confirmed more consistent and compact 3D architectures on SHS1. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrates that SHS1, a fluorinated superhydrophobic coating, is more effective than SHS2 in supporting the formation of viable and structurally coherent 3D co-culture spheroids. These findings underscore the potential of SHS1 as a low-cost, tunable platform for developing in vitro cancer models and advancing the study of tumor-stroma interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18070953
Citations
1
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Superhydrophobicity Effects on Spheroid Formation, Structure, and Viability on Co-Culture Conditions

M. Carmen Morán, Francesca Cirisano, Michele Ferrari
1 citations
Pharmaceuticals
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.67
article

Superhydrophobicity Effects on Spheroid Formation, Structure, and Viability on Co-Culture Conditions

M. Carmen Morán, Francesca Cirisano, Michele Ferrari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models more accurately simulate the in vivo tissue environments as compared to conventional two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cultures. Among these, spheroid cultures are particularly valuable for pharmaceutical research, as they allow for the study of tumor growth, drug responses, and cell-cell interactions in a physiologically relevant manner. Superhydrophobic surfaces (SHSs) have shown a promise in enhancing spheroid formation by reducing cell-substrate adhesion and promoting cell-cell aggregation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two different SHS coatings (SHS1: fluorinated; SHS2: silicone-based) in generating co-culture spheroids composed of non-tumoral fibroblasts (3T3) and tumoral epidermoid carcinoma cells (A431), thereby mimicking aspects of the tumor microenvironment. <b>Methods:</b> Co-cultures of 3T3 and A431 cells were seeded at varying ratios onto SHS1 and SHS2 substrates to assess their ability to support 3D spheroid formation. Spheroids were characterized by measurements of circularity and size distribution, viability through live/dead staining, and surface topography using 3D profilometry. <b>Results:</b> Spheroid formation was significantly influenced by both the surface properties and the fibroblast-to-carcinoma cell ratio. The fluorinated SHS1 surface facilitated superior cell viability and promoted the formation of well-rounded, uniform spheroids. In contrast, the silicone-based SHS2 surface resulted in less defined spheroidal structures and lower overall viability. Profilometry confirmed more consistent and compact 3D architectures on SHS1. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrates that SHS1, a fluorinated superhydrophobic coating, is more effective than SHS2 in supporting the formation of viable and structurally coherent 3D co-culture spheroids. These findings underscore the potential of SHS1 as a low-cost, tunable platform for developing in vitro cancer models and advancing the study of tumor-stroma interactions.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 18(7)
Institute of Condensed Matter Chemistry and Technologies for Energy (IT), Institut de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia de la Universitat de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
European Commission
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.