Advancing gene-editing platforms to improve the viability of rare-disease therapeutics: key insights from a 2024 Scientific Exchange hosted by ARM, ISCT, and Danaher

Rare-disease therapeutics face viability challenges due to small patient populations and drug-development and regulatory frameworks that were not developed to address rapidly progressive or quickly fatal conditions. Because the majority of rare diseases are genetic in nature, gene-editing modalities offer substantial promise. This Scientific Exchange, co-hosted by the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine, the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy, and Danaher Corporation in November 2024, set out to address the challenge of realizing the full promise of gene editing for rare-disease therapies by advancing platforms that leverage stable and reusable processes or components to develop multiple therapies. Through multi-stakeholder engagement and discussions of case studies in CRISPR/Cas nuclease, base, and prime editing, 4 key opportunities emerged that deliver value by holding platform elements constant and/or streamlining development steps: (1) consistent delivery vehicle; (2) consistent manufacturing; (3) benefit-risk appropriate quality requirements; and (4) expansive clinical trial designs. Together, these opportunities could yield up to 5-fold efficiency gains and result in substantial value creation for patients, regulators, and developers, potentially decreasing the time required to dose patients with a new gene-editing therapy from years down to 6 months.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cytotherapy
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2025.06.010
Citations
4
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing gene-editing platforms to improve the viability of rare-disease therapeutics: key insights from a 2024 Scientific Exchange hosted by ARM, ISCT, and Danaher

Harry L. Malech, Josephine Lembong, Ann Y. Lee, Fyodor D. Urnov et al.
4 citations
Cytotherapy
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
3.22
article

Advancing gene-editing platforms to improve the viability of rare-disease therapeutics: key insights from a 2024 Scientific Exchange hosted by ARM, ISCT, and Danaher

Harry L. Malech, Josephine Lembong, Ann Y. Lee, Fyodor D. Urnov, Nicholas Gertler, Julianne Bruno, Kiran Musunuru, Pam Stetkiewicz, Matt Diver, Sadik H. Kassim, Luis Barrera, Matthew Hewitt, David R. Liu, Troy Lister, Felix Grignon, Audrey N. Le, Lindsay Gasch, Michael Lehmicke, Vanessa Almendro-Navarro
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Rare-disease therapeutics face viability challenges due to small patient populations and drug-development and regulatory frameworks that were not developed to address rapidly progressive or quickly fatal conditions. Because the majority of rare diseases are genetic in nature, gene-editing modalities offer substantial promise. This Scientific Exchange, co-hosted by the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine, the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy, and Danaher Corporation in November 2024, set out to address the challenge of realizing the full promise of gene editing for rare-disease therapies by advancing platforms that leverage stable and reusable processes or components to develop multiple therapies. Through multi-stakeholder engagement and discussions of case studies in CRISPR/Cas nuclease, base, and prime editing, 4 key opportunities emerged that deliver value by holding platform elements constant and/or streamlining development steps: (1) consistent delivery vehicle; (2) consistent manufacturing; (3) benefit-risk appropriate quality requirements; and (4) expansive clinical trial designs. Together, these opportunities could yield up to 5-fold efficiency gains and result in substantial value creation for patients, regulators, and developers, potentially decreasing the time required to dose patients with a new gene-editing therapy from years down to 6 months.

CytotherapyVol. 27(10)
Broad Institute (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Danaher (United States) (US), White Ribbon Alliance (US), Banner Wyoming Medical Center (US), Innovative Genomics Institute (US), Raptamer Discovery Group (United States) (US), Verve Therapeutics (United States) (US), Charles River Laboratories (United States) (US), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), Fidelity Biosciences (United States) (US), Global Alliance for Regenerative Medicine (HN), AtlantiCare (US), CRISPR Therapeutics (Switzerland) (CH), International Society for Cellular Therapy (CA), Beam Therapeutics (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.