Addressing Humanity’s failure to establish Existential Security

This paper defines and develops an existential security approach to nuclear politics. Its findings suggest humanity suffers an emergency condition by the objective existential threat of nuclear war. The Liberal International Order has not addressed this existential (in)security, prioritising liberal internationalism and the maintenance of the nuclear order. Current prospects of a severe NATO-Russia war, a Sino-American conflict or an uncontained iteration of either, could warp into a systemic war leading to mutual extermination, fatally unravelling the legitimacy of the US-led world order, its reliance on national security, collective defence, and deterrence practice. If existential security is imperilled by the risk of nuclear war – explicitly – why does the recognition of this threat not warrant a re-ordering of the LIO? The dangerous routine of nuclearism provides states with ontological security internationally, which undermines the liberal or decent self-identity, domestically. A reordering of the international system offers one escape from these contradictions. This would involve a restoration of great power relations in a ‘common security’ arrangement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Political Theory
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882251342390
Primary Topic
Nuclear Issues and Defense
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing Humanity’s failure to establish Existential Security

Rhys Lewis-Jones
Journal of International Political Theory
Nuclear Issues and Defense
article

Addressing Humanity’s failure to establish Existential Security

Rhys Lewis-Jones
article en

Abstract

This paper defines and develops an existential security approach to nuclear politics. Its findings suggest humanity suffers an emergency condition by the objective existential threat of nuclear war. The Liberal International Order has not addressed this existential (in)security, prioritising liberal internationalism and the maintenance of the nuclear order. Current prospects of a severe NATO-Russia war, a Sino-American conflict or an uncontained iteration of either, could warp into a systemic war leading to mutual extermination, fatally unravelling the legitimacy of the US-led world order, its reliance on national security, collective defence, and deterrence practice. If existential security is imperilled by the risk of nuclear war – explicitly – why does the recognition of this threat not warrant a re-ordering of the LIO? The dangerous routine of nuclearism provides states with ontological security internationally, which undermines the liberal or decent self-identity, domestically. A reordering of the international system offers one escape from these contradictions. This would involve a restoration of great power relations in a ‘common security’ arrangement.

Journal of International Political TheoryVol. 22(1)
Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Nuclear Issues and Defense
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.