Refusal of consent as a limitation of legal possibilities

The problem of refusal of consent as a limitation of legal possibilities is considered. The purpose of the study is to analyse the fact of refusal of consent as a restriction of legal possibilities. The author distinguishes between situations of restriction of rights and the establishment of special conditions for the realisation of rights. When considering the refusal of consent, the author distinguishes the types of refusal of consent (refusal to give consent and refusal of consent already given), establishes the elements of refusal of consent. Emphasis is placed on the fact that in a state governed by the rule of law it is possible to establish restrictions. It is concluded that these restrictions as a degree of possible realisation of subjective possibility should be legislated and expressed in a specific legal relationship. The necessity of obtaining consent both from the subject of the legal relation and a third party in a particular legal relation acts as a condition for the realisation of the right, and in some cases as a legally established restriction of the powers of the participants of the legal relation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Issues of the State and Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2025-9-2-182-187
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refusal of consent as a limitation of legal possibilities

Kristina V. Suddenok
Current Issues of the State and Law
Law in Society and Culture
article

Refusal of consent as a limitation of legal possibilities

Kristina V. Suddenok
article en

Abstract

The problem of refusal of consent as a limitation of legal possibilities is considered. The purpose of the study is to analyse the fact of refusal of consent as a restriction of legal possibilities. The author distinguishes between situations of restriction of rights and the establishment of special conditions for the realisation of rights. When considering the refusal of consent, the author distinguishes the types of refusal of consent (refusal to give consent and refusal of consent already given), establishes the elements of refusal of consent. Emphasis is placed on the fact that in a state governed by the rule of law it is possible to establish restrictions. It is concluded that these restrictions as a degree of possible realisation of subjective possibility should be legislated and expressed in a specific legal relationship. The necessity of obtaining consent both from the subject of the legal relation and a third party in a particular legal relation acts as a condition for the realisation of the right, and in some cases as a legally established restriction of the powers of the participants of the legal relation.

Current Issues of the State and Law
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Refusal of consent as a limitation of legal possibilities — Kristina V. Suddenok · Current Issues of the State and Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS