Acceptability of Hypothetical HIV Cure-Related Research Modalities: A Cross-Sectional Study of People Living with HIV in Soweto, South Africa

Various modalities are being explored in HIV cure-related research, but little is documented on their acceptability in Africa, where HIV is most prevalent. To address this, we conducted a cross-sectional study in Soweto, South Africa, assessing stated acceptability of five potential HIV cure-related research modalities and identifying associated factors. Between May and August 2024, we sampled 100 adults living with HIV who provided informed consent. Participants completed questionnaires of socio-demographics and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability scale measuring general acceptability and seven constructs (affective attitude, burden, ethicality, perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, self-efficacy, opportunity costs). We summarized data using descriptive statistics. We assessed factors associated with acceptability using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. We found that of 100 participants (44% female, median age 39 years), 66% were willing to accept an intervention that would allow lifelong remission (antiretroviral treatment-free control), 88% were willing if the intervention guaranteed remission for everyone treated, and 87% were willing if the intervention had minimal side effects. Total mean acceptability scores of hypothetical HIV cure-related research modalities were oral or injectable chemotherapeutics (3.8/5), intravenous or injectable antibodies (3.7/5), radiotherapy (3.3/5), transplantation (3.1/5), gene therapy (2.9/5), and across all modalities (3.4/5). Participants rated antibodies and chemotherapeutics with tied top scores for affective attitude (3.8/5) and self-efficacy (4.0/5); chemotherapeutics with top scores for perceived effectiveness (4.0/5), intervention coherence (4.1/5) and having least burden (3.2/5) and opportunity costs (3.3/5); and antibodies with the top score for ethicality (4.2/5). Acceptability was associated with non-binary gender and willingness to take an intervention achieving 2 years remission. In conclusion, people living with HIV have moderately high acceptability for oral or injectable chemotherapeutics and intravenous or injectable antibodies but would need more information about gene therapy, transplantation, and radiotherapy. Antibodies aligned highest with personal values, suggesting support for antibody research and applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/aid.2025.0002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability of Hypothetical HIV Cure-Related Research Modalities: A Cross-Sectional Study of People Living with HIV in Soweto, South Africa

Mbalenhle Sibiya, Kennedy Otwombe, Fatima Laher, Nyebe Phineas Mahlangu
2 citations
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
2.79
article

Acceptability of Hypothetical HIV Cure-Related Research Modalities: A Cross-Sectional Study of People Living with HIV in Soweto, South Africa

Mbalenhle Sibiya, Kennedy Otwombe, Fatima Laher, Nyebe Phineas Mahlangu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Various modalities are being explored in HIV cure-related research, but little is documented on their acceptability in Africa, where HIV is most prevalent. To address this, we conducted a cross-sectional study in Soweto, South Africa, assessing stated acceptability of five potential HIV cure-related research modalities and identifying associated factors. Between May and August 2024, we sampled 100 adults living with HIV who provided informed consent. Participants completed questionnaires of socio-demographics and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability scale measuring general acceptability and seven constructs (affective attitude, burden, ethicality, perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, self-efficacy, opportunity costs). We summarized data using descriptive statistics. We assessed factors associated with acceptability using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. We found that of 100 participants (44% female, median age 39 years), 66% were willing to accept an intervention that would allow lifelong remission (antiretroviral treatment-free control), 88% were willing if the intervention guaranteed remission for everyone treated, and 87% were willing if the intervention had minimal side effects. Total mean acceptability scores of hypothetical HIV cure-related research modalities were oral or injectable chemotherapeutics (3.8/5), intravenous or injectable antibodies (3.7/5), radiotherapy (3.3/5), transplantation (3.1/5), gene therapy (2.9/5), and across all modalities (3.4/5). Participants rated antibodies and chemotherapeutics with tied top scores for affective attitude (3.8/5) and self-efficacy (4.0/5); chemotherapeutics with top scores for perceived effectiveness (4.0/5), intervention coherence (4.1/5) and having least burden (3.2/5) and opportunity costs (3.3/5); and antibodies with the top score for ethicality (4.2/5). Acceptability was associated with non-binary gender and willingness to take an intervention achieving 2 years remission. In conclusion, people living with HIV have moderately high acceptability for oral or injectable chemotherapeutics and intravenous or injectable antibodies but would need more information about gene therapy, transplantation, and radiotherapy. Antibodies aligned highest with personal values, suggesting support for antibody research and applications.

AIDS Research and Human RetrovirusesVol. 41(11)
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Perinatal HIV Research Unit (ZA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.