Improving the System for Evaluating the Efficiency and Performance of Civil Servants

This article addresses the pressing issue of improving the system for evaluating the efficiency and performance of civil servants within the context of public administration development and enhancing the quality of public services. The aim of the study is to develop proposals for modernizing the existing evaluation system for civil servants based on a fundamental analysis of theoretical approaches, domestic practices, and international experience. The work presents a comprehensive analysis of both the key categories and approaches used in this field, as well as the current regulatory and legal framework. The current state of Russia’s civil servant evaluation system is examined, revealing key issues such as procedural formalism, subjectivity, weak connection with HR processes, insufficient evaluator competence, and underdeveloped information and analytical systems. Advanced international practices in civil servant evaluation are reviewed, including those in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Canada. The article proposes main directions for improvement: the implementation of results-based management using key performance indicators (KPIs); the development of a competency-based approach; digitalization of evaluation procedures; and strengthening the link between evaluation outcomes and motivation mechanisms. The study’s methodology is grounded in scientific methods such as analysis and synthesis. The results can be used in the modernization of the civil servant evaluation system, as well as in the development of legal and methodological documents in this field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Sciences
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022x-2025-15-2-19-36
Primary Topic
Banking, Crisis Management, COVID-19 Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the System for Evaluating the Efficiency and Performance of Civil Servants

Natalia Aleksandrovna Zavalko, N. L. Krasyukova, A. A. Bakulina
Management Sciences
Banking, Crisis Management, COVID-19 Impact
article

Improving the System for Evaluating the Efficiency and Performance of Civil Servants

Natalia Aleksandrovna Zavalko, N. L. Krasyukova, A. A. Bakulina
article en

Abstract

This article addresses the pressing issue of improving the system for evaluating the efficiency and performance of civil servants within the context of public administration development and enhancing the quality of public services. The aim of the study is to develop proposals for modernizing the existing evaluation system for civil servants based on a fundamental analysis of theoretical approaches, domestic practices, and international experience. The work presents a comprehensive analysis of both the key categories and approaches used in this field, as well as the current regulatory and legal framework. The current state of Russia’s civil servant evaluation system is examined, revealing key issues such as procedural formalism, subjectivity, weak connection with HR processes, insufficient evaluator competence, and underdeveloped information and analytical systems. Advanced international practices in civil servant evaluation are reviewed, including those in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Canada. The article proposes main directions for improvement: the implementation of results-based management using key performance indicators (KPIs); the development of a competency-based approach; digitalization of evaluation procedures; and strengthening the link between evaluation outcomes and motivation mechanisms. The study’s methodology is grounded in scientific methods such as analysis and synthesis. The results can be used in the modernization of the civil servant evaluation system, as well as in the development of legal and methodological documents in this field.

Management SciencesVol. 15(2)
Financial University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Banking, Crisis Management, COVID-19 Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.