The Effect of Adding Bioactive Glass Infused with Strontium on the Surface Hardness and Surface Roughness Properties of a Heat-Cured Acrylic-Based Soft Liner

Background: Soft liners offer a cushioning effect that aids in the healing of inflamed mucosa and allocates the relevant load in the support area of prostheses, enhancing their fit and stability. This study looks at how strontium-infused phosphate bioactive glass affects a heat-cured acrylic-based soft liner, focusing on the surface hardness and the surface roughness of the material. Methods: One hundred soft liner specimens were produced, with fifty specimens being designated for surface hardness testing and fifty specimens for surface roughness testing. PBG*Sr was incorporated into the soft liner at the concentrations of 1 wt.%, 3 wt.%, 5 wt.%, and 7 wt.%. Surface hardness and surface roughness were evaluated with a digital durometer for Shore A hardness and a profilometer, respectively. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis and field emission scanning electron microscopy were employed. Results: The Shapiro–Wilk test demonstrated that the data adhered to a normal distribution, as the p-values were not statistically significant. Subsequently, for statistical analyses following the one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s T3 post hoc test was employed for surface hardness, while Tukey’s post hoc test was used for surface roughness. The lowest hardness value was documented in the 7 wt.% subgroup (29.040 ± 0.070), followed by the 5 wt.% subgroup (30.97 ± 0.231), and the control (40.880 ± 0.473) had the highest hardness mean value. The 7 wt.% subgroup displayed the lowest value of Ra recorded, 0.489 ± 0.077 μm, while the control subgroup showed the highest, 1.994 ± 0.168 μm. FTIR analysis suggested that the domination of physical interactions according to the analyses with the FESEM led to improved surface morphology for the 7 wt.% PBG*Sr specimens. Conclusions: The 7 wt.% PBG*Sr specimens exhibited the lowest surface hardness, suitable for soft lining material, and improved the surface morphology of acrylic soft liners compared with the control and other concentrations.