Designing for Inclusion: A Comparative Analysis of Inclusive Campus Planning Across Australian Universities

Inclusive campus design is increasingly being recognised as a key component of sustainable and equitable higher education environments. However, limited research has been carried out on this topic, particularly examining university campuses in Australia. Hence, this paper examines how principles of inclusion are embedded in the spatial planning and architectural design of Australian university campuses. Focusing on a comparative analysis of six Melbourne-based institutions, Victoria University, the University of Melbourne, Deakin University, RMIT University, La Trobe University, and Monash University, this study explores how each campus addresses accessibility, cultural diversity, social equity, and environmental comfort to achieve inclusivity. Drawing on site observations, planning documents, and design frameworks, this paper assesses the extent to which these universities operationalise inclusive design within their built environments. The analysis is guided by a theoretical framework combining universal design, spatial justice, and climate-responsive planning. The findings reveal diverse approaches across institutions, with some campuses demonstrating holistic and integrated strategies, while others exhibit more fragmented or symbolic applications. This paper concludes by outlining best practices and key design enablers that can inform more inclusive and sustainable campus development in Australia and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Architecture
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture5030043
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing for Inclusion: A Comparative Analysis of Inclusive Campus Planning Across Australian Universities

Cheuk Yin Wai, Hing-Wah Chau, Se Yan, Elmira Jamei et al.
3 citations
Architecture
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
26.78
article

Designing for Inclusion: A Comparative Analysis of Inclusive Campus Planning Across Australian Universities

Cheuk Yin Wai, Hing-Wah Chau, Se Yan, Elmira Jamei, Jinxi Wei, Shiran Geng, Jia Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Inclusive campus design is increasingly being recognised as a key component of sustainable and equitable higher education environments. However, limited research has been carried out on this topic, particularly examining university campuses in Australia. Hence, this paper examines how principles of inclusion are embedded in the spatial planning and architectural design of Australian university campuses. Focusing on a comparative analysis of six Melbourne-based institutions, Victoria University, the University of Melbourne, Deakin University, RMIT University, La Trobe University, and Monash University, this study explores how each campus addresses accessibility, cultural diversity, social equity, and environmental comfort to achieve inclusivity. Drawing on site observations, planning documents, and design frameworks, this paper assesses the extent to which these universities operationalise inclusive design within their built environments. The analysis is guided by a theoretical framework combining universal design, spatial justice, and climate-responsive planning. The findings reveal diverse approaches across institutions, with some campuses demonstrating holistic and integrated strategies, while others exhibit more fragmented or symbolic applications. This paper concludes by outlining best practices and key design enablers that can inform more inclusive and sustainable campus development in Australia and beyond.

ArchitectureVol. 5(3)
Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Curtin University (AU), Victoria University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
26.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Designing for Inclusion: A Comparative Analysis of Inclusive Campus Planning Across Australian Universities — Cheuk Yin Wai, Hing-Wah Chau, et al. · Architecture (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS