Efficacy of Center-Based Learning on Students’ Science Performance

Traditional classroom settings generally favor direct, teacher-centered instruction, in which students are expected to absorb a fixed body of knowledge. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the center-based learning approach (CBLA) in teaching science subjects and its impact on students' academic performance compared to the conventional teaching approach. Additionally, the study explored junior high school science teachers’ perceptions of CBLA’s effectiveness in enhancing students' learning capabilities, based on the Proven Effectiveness Framework (PEF). This study is quantitative in nature and employed a quasi-experimental research design to evaluate the efficacy of the center-based learning approach on students’ academic performance. A total of 60 Grade 10 students from two sections of Prosperidad National High School participated in the study during the school year 2024–2025. The assessment focused on the Grade 10 Science curriculum based on the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs), specifically covering topics such as volcanoes, earthquakes, epicenters, and mountain ranges. A 50-item multiple-choice test was used as the main instrument to measure students’ learning outcomes. Findings revealed a significant difference in performance between the experimental and control groups. The experimental group, which was exposed to the center-based learning approach, achieved a mean score of 47.10 with a standard deviation of 4.87 and a p-value of 0.000, indicating a statistically significant improvement. The control group recorded a mean score of 30.05 in the posttest, with an overall mastery level of 60.23. The data also showed that science teachers’ perceptions aligned with the effectiveness of CBLA based on the established criteria. Overall, the center-based learning approach proved more effective than the conventional method in improving students’ academic performance in junior high school science, particularly among Grade 10 students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i72146
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Center-Based Learning on Students’ Science Performance

Jeffry M Saro, Emmanuel N. Pelesco
1 citations
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
article

Efficacy of Center-Based Learning on Students’ Science Performance

Jeffry M Saro, Emmanuel N. Pelesco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Traditional classroom settings generally favor direct, teacher-centered instruction, in which students are expected to absorb a fixed body of knowledge. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the center-based learning approach (CBLA) in teaching science subjects and its impact on students' academic performance compared to the conventional teaching approach. Additionally, the study explored junior high school science teachers’ perceptions of CBLA’s effectiveness in enhancing students' learning capabilities, based on the Proven Effectiveness Framework (PEF). This study is quantitative in nature and employed a quasi-experimental research design to evaluate the efficacy of the center-based learning approach on students’ academic performance. A total of 60 Grade 10 students from two sections of Prosperidad National High School participated in the study during the school year 2024–2025. The assessment focused on the Grade 10 Science curriculum based on the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs), specifically covering topics such as volcanoes, earthquakes, epicenters, and mountain ranges. A 50-item multiple-choice test was used as the main instrument to measure students’ learning outcomes. Findings revealed a significant difference in performance between the experimental and control groups. The experimental group, which was exposed to the center-based learning approach, achieved a mean score of 47.10 with a standard deviation of 4.87 and a p-value of 0.000, indicating a statistically significant improvement. The control group recorded a mean score of 30.05 in the posttest, with an overall mastery level of 60.23. The data also showed that science teachers’ perceptions aligned with the effectiveness of CBLA based on the established criteria. Overall, the center-based learning approach proved more effective than the conventional method in improving students’ academic performance in junior high school science, particularly among Grade 10 students.

Asian Journal of Education and Social StudiesVol. 51(7)
Caraga State University (PH), North Eastern Mindanao State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.