Training in the ABCDE approach by simulation for medical students

One-hundred-forty-seven volunteer medical students in the 3rd (G1, 24 teams) and 202 in the 4th (G2, 30 teams) received a 15-minute lecture about the ABCDE approach. Then they managed two simulated patients (one with chest pain, and one with acute dyspnoea), with the task of implementing the strategy. In the second scenario, several items of the ABCDE sequence improved among G1 (SO2 measured in 96% in the second scenario versus 69 % in the first one, RR 92 vs. 67%, HR 92% vs. 67%, BP 100% vs. 832%, GCS 88% vs. 58%, Temperature 71% vs. 46%, p<0.05 for GCS and Temperature). The ability to identify “red flags” improved significantly between the first and the second simulation for both subgroups (G1 96% vs. 58%, G2 57% vs. 20%). A brief activity in simulation enabled medical students to assess comprehensively critical patients and to identify the “red flags” of each scenario.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emergency Care Journal
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2025.13745
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training in the ABCDE approach by simulation for medical students

Simone Vanni, Valerio Mazzilli, Francesca Innocenti, Linda Vignozzi et al.
Emergency Care Journal
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Training in the ABCDE approach by simulation for medical students

Simone Vanni, Valerio Mazzilli, Francesca Innocenti, Linda Vignozzi, Giuseppe Trainito, Francesco Pepe, Maria Antonella Pinelli, Bruna Lupo
article en

Abstract

One-hundred-forty-seven volunteer medical students in the 3rd (G1, 24 teams) and 202 in the 4th (G2, 30 teams) received a 15-minute lecture about the ABCDE approach. Then they managed two simulated patients (one with chest pain, and one with acute dyspnoea), with the task of implementing the strategy. In the second scenario, several items of the ABCDE sequence improved among G1 (SO2 measured in 96% in the second scenario versus 69 % in the first one, RR 92 vs. 67%, HR 92% vs. 67%, BP 100% vs. 832%, GCS 88% vs. 58%, Temperature 71% vs. 46%, p<0.05 for GCS and Temperature). The ability to identify “red flags” improved significantly between the first and the second simulation for both subgroups (G1 96% vs. 58%, G2 57% vs. 20%). A brief activity in simulation enabled medical students to assess comprehensively critical patients and to identify the “red flags” of each scenario.

Emergency Care JournalVol. 21(3)
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Training in the ABCDE approach by simulation for medical students — Simone Vanni, Valerio Mazzilli, et al. · Emergency Care Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS