Gender, Network Recall, and Structural Holes

ABSTRACT Accurate recall of social networks is critical to individuals' success in organizations, as it enables them to leverage networks more effectively. Understanding whether men or women exhibit greater recall accuracy is particularly important given persistent gender inequalities in workplaces and the role of networks in shaping access to social resources and opportunities. We propose that women and men exhibit different levels of recall accuracy, which depend on the structural characteristics of the network. Specifically, women's greater reliance on the triadic closure mental schema—assuming a relationship between two individuals who are both connected to the same third party—enhances their recall accuracy in more cohesive networks with many closed triads but diminishes it in networks with more structural holes. Across three studies, including a demographically diverse sample representative of the US population, we confirm that women exhibit superior network recall accuracy on average and show that this advantage is contingent on network structure. This research advances our understanding of gender differences in network cognition and offers a potential cognitive explanation for women's underrepresentation in brokerage positions, which require recognizing open triads.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personnel Psychology
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12691
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender, Network Recall, and Structural Holes

Raina A. Brands, Matthew E. Brashears, Helena V. González‐Gómez, Eric Quintane
1 citations
Personnel Psychology
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
article

Gender, Network Recall, and Structural Holes

Raina A. Brands, Matthew E. Brashears, Helena V. González‐Gómez, Eric Quintane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate recall of social networks is critical to individuals' success in organizations, as it enables them to leverage networks more effectively. Understanding whether men or women exhibit greater recall accuracy is particularly important given persistent gender inequalities in workplaces and the role of networks in shaping access to social resources and opportunities. We propose that women and men exhibit different levels of recall accuracy, which depend on the structural characteristics of the network. Specifically, women's greater reliance on the triadic closure mental schema—assuming a relationship between two individuals who are both connected to the same third party—enhances their recall accuracy in more cohesive networks with many closed triads but diminishes it in networks with more structural holes. Across three studies, including a demographically diverse sample representative of the US population, we confirm that women exhibit superior network recall accuracy on average and show that this advantage is contingent on network structure. This research advances our understanding of gender differences in network cognition and offers a potential cognitive explanation for women's underrepresentation in brokerage positions, which require recognizing open triads.

Personnel PsychologyVol. 78(4)
NEOMA Business School (FR), University of South Carolina (US), University College London (GB), European School of Management and Technology (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gender, Network Recall, and Structural Holes — Raina A. Brands, Matthew E. Brashears, et al. · Personnel Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS