Comparative Study of Mivan Technology and Conventional RCC Structures in High Seismic Zones

The growing demand for rapid urban development, coupled with the increasing risk of earthquakes in certain regions, has necessitated the adoption of construction technologies that offer both structural safety and speed of execution. This research presents a comparative study between Mivan formwork construction and conventional Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) systems. A G+12 residential building model was developed and analysed under seismic and wind loads using advanced structural analysis software. Key structural parameters such as storey displacement, inter-storey drift, base shear, and natural time period were examined for both construction systems. The findings demonstrate that Mivan structures, due to their monolithic and joint-free construction technique, perform better under lateral forces, showing reduced displacement and drift. Moreover, the speed of construction and labour efficiency in Mivan technology make it a suitable choice for mass housing projects in seismic zones. This study provides valuable insights into the selection of structural systems for safe, efficient, and durable high-rise construction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.72670
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Mivan Technology and Conventional RCC Structures in High Seismic Zones

Anmol hinduja
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
article

Comparative Study of Mivan Technology and Conventional RCC Structures in High Seismic Zones

Anmol hinduja
article en

Abstract

The growing demand for rapid urban development, coupled with the increasing risk of earthquakes in certain regions, has necessitated the adoption of construction technologies that offer both structural safety and speed of execution. This research presents a comparative study between Mivan formwork construction and conventional Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) systems. A G+12 residential building model was developed and analysed under seismic and wind loads using advanced structural analysis software. Key structural parameters such as storey displacement, inter-storey drift, base shear, and natural time period were examined for both construction systems. The findings demonstrate that Mivan structures, due to their monolithic and joint-free construction technique, perform better under lateral forces, showing reduced displacement and drift. Moreover, the speed of construction and labour efficiency in Mivan technology make it a suitable choice for mass housing projects in seismic zones. This study provides valuable insights into the selection of structural systems for safe, efficient, and durable high-rise construction.

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologyVol. 13(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.