Comparative analysis of mouse strains for in vivo induction of reprogramming factors

In vivo reprogramming through the forced expression of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM) has demonstrated great potential for reversing age-associated phenotypes. However, continuous in vivo OSKM expression has raised safety concerns due to loss of cell identity, decrease in body weight, and premature death. Although cyclic short-term or targeted expression of the reprogramming factors can mitigate some of these detrimental effects, systemic rejuvenation of wild-type mice has remained elusive. To improve the fundamental understanding of in vivo reprogramming, we conduct a comparative analysis of various reprogrammable mouse strains across multiple tissues and organs. In addition, we develop reprogrammable mouse strains by avoiding OSKM expression in specific organs or implementing expression approaches within specific cells, thereby offering safer strategies to induce in vivo reprogramming. We hope that these tools will become valuable resources for future research in this field of research with potential implications to human health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115879
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of mouse strains for in vivo induction of reprogramming factors

Clémence Branchina, Ferdinand von Meyenn, Céline Yacoub Maroun, Alba Vílchez-Acosta et al.
2 citations
Cell Reports
Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
1.61
article

Comparative analysis of mouse strains for in vivo induction of reprogramming factors

Clémence Branchina, Ferdinand von Meyenn, Céline Yacoub Maroun, Alba Vílchez-Acosta, Gabriela Desdín-Micó, Calida Mrabti, María del Carmen Lapo Maza, Alberto Parras, Alejandro Ocampo, Sara Picó, João Agostinho de Sousa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In vivo reprogramming through the forced expression of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM) has demonstrated great potential for reversing age-associated phenotypes. However, continuous in vivo OSKM expression has raised safety concerns due to loss of cell identity, decrease in body weight, and premature death. Although cyclic short-term or targeted expression of the reprogramming factors can mitigate some of these detrimental effects, systemic rejuvenation of wild-type mice has remained elusive. To improve the fundamental understanding of in vivo reprogramming, we conduct a comparative analysis of various reprogrammable mouse strains across multiple tissues and organs. In addition, we develop reprogrammable mouse strains by avoiding OSKM expression in specific organs or implementing expression approaches within specific cells, thereby offering safer strategies to induce in vivo reprogramming. We hope that these tools will become valuable resources for future research in this field of research with potential implications to human health.

Cell ReportsVol. 44(7)
ETH Zurich (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
National Science Foundation, Milky Way Research Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Université de Lausanne
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of mouse strains for in vivo induction of reprogramming factors — Clémence Branchina, Ferdinand von Meyenn, et al. · Cell Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS