Risks of ignoring uncertainty propagation in AI‐augmented security pipelines

The use of AI technologies is being integrated into the secure development of software-based systems, with an increasing trend of composing AI-based subsystems (with uncertain levels of performance) into automated pipelines. This presents a fundamental research challenge and seriously threatens safety-critical domains. Despite the existing knowledge about uncertainty in risk analysis, no previous work has estimated the uncertainty of AI-augmented systems given the propagation of errors in the pipeline. We provide the formal underpinnings for capturing uncertainty propagation, develop a simulator to quantify uncertainty, and evaluate the simulation of propagating errors with one case study. We discuss the generalizability of our approach and its limitations and present recommendations for evaluation policies concerning AI systems. Future work includes extending the approach by relaxing the remaining assumptions and by experimenting with a real system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Analysis
Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70059
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risks of ignoring uncertainty propagation in AI‐augmented security pipelines

Katja Tuma, Aurora Papotti, Fabio Massacci, Emanuele Mezzi
2 citations
Risk Analysis
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
4.96
article

Risks of ignoring uncertainty propagation in AI‐augmented security pipelines

Katja Tuma, Aurora Papotti, Fabio Massacci, Emanuele Mezzi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The use of AI technologies is being integrated into the secure development of software-based systems, with an increasing trend of composing AI-based subsystems (with uncertain levels of performance) into automated pipelines. This presents a fundamental research challenge and seriously threatens safety-critical domains. Despite the existing knowledge about uncertainty in risk analysis, no previous work has estimated the uncertainty of AI-augmented systems given the propagation of errors in the pipeline. We provide the formal underpinnings for capturing uncertainty propagation, develop a simulator to quantify uncertainty, and evaluate the simulation of propagating errors with one case study. We discuss the generalizability of our approach and its limitations and present recommendations for evaluation policies concerning AI systems. Future work includes extending the approach by relaxing the remaining assumptions and by experimenting with a real system.

Risk AnalysisVol. 45(12)
University of Trento (IT), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Civil security for society
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Risks of ignoring uncertainty propagation in AI‐augmented security pipelines — Katja Tuma, Aurora Papotti, et al. · Risk Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS