Capacity Building and Localization: Insights From Liberia

ABSTRACT The question of how to structure international aid equitably to empower the local community and give agency to local civil society organizations (CSOs) is a recurrent theme in debates around international aid. A common strategy to enable local actors to have greater agency in the international aid system is for international donors to invest in the capacity of local CSOs through targeted capacity‐building programs. Donors incorporate capacity‐building programs into their programs, believing that increased capacity will empower and enable local actors. Scholarship on capacity building, however, has shown that capacity‐building programs are often implemented top‐down and align with the priorities and objectives of Western donors. Through the case of Liberia, this study examines the motivations and objectives of capacity‐building programs from the perspective of local CSOs. Through mapping current capacity‐building programs in Liberia and conducting focus groups with local CSO leaders, we offer empirical evidence that the capacity‐building programs available to Liberian CSOs do not meet their needs, as expressed by local CSO leaders. We contribute to the ongoing debates around capacity building by showing that the disconnect between available programs and motivations of local CSOs calls for a need for localizing capacity building for such programs to maintain the promise of the localization agenda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capacity Building and Localization: Insights From Liberia

Brian Ezeonu, Sindhu Weber, Elena Roversi, Peter Weber et al.
1 citations
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
International Development and Aid
3.45
article

Capacity Building and Localization: Insights From Liberia

Brian Ezeonu, Sindhu Weber, Elena Roversi, Peter Weber, Kelly Krawczyk, Brittany Branyon, Lucky Chambers Umezulike, Benedict Quato
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The question of how to structure international aid equitably to empower the local community and give agency to local civil society organizations (CSOs) is a recurrent theme in debates around international aid. A common strategy to enable local actors to have greater agency in the international aid system is for international donors to invest in the capacity of local CSOs through targeted capacity‐building programs. Donors incorporate capacity‐building programs into their programs, believing that increased capacity will empower and enable local actors. Scholarship on capacity building, however, has shown that capacity‐building programs are often implemented top‐down and align with the priorities and objectives of Western donors. Through the case of Liberia, this study examines the motivations and objectives of capacity‐building programs from the perspective of local CSOs. Through mapping current capacity‐building programs in Liberia and conducting focus groups with local CSO leaders, we offer empirical evidence that the capacity‐building programs available to Liberian CSOs do not meet their needs, as expressed by local CSO leaders. We contribute to the ongoing debates around capacity building by showing that the disconnect between available programs and motivations of local CSOs calls for a need for localizing capacity building for such programs to maintain the promise of the localization agenda.

Nonprofit Management and LeadershipVol. 36(3)
University of Liberia (LR), Planned Parenthood Association of Liberia (LR), Capital Impact Partners (US), Community Impact (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
International Development and Aid
3.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.