Neural bases of goal-frame theory: Assessing the nature and persuasion of normative, hedonic, and gain environmental messages

Managers and policymakers have increasingly adopted the use of communication campaigns to promote environmentally responsible behaviors. Through a wide variety of frames, these campaigns can encourage more sustainable actions from citizens. Goal-frame theory suggests that three primary goals (normative, gain, and hedonic) can promote pro-environmental behavior in different ways when embedded in messages. This paper presents the first controlled experimental study of the processes that govern the activation of these goals and their subsequent impact on the persuasiveness of messages promoting pro-environmental behaviors (e.g., recycling, responsible water consumption, reduced electricity use, and handling of toxic products). The study shows the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the processing of normative, gain, and hedonic messages. It also reveals their comparative persuasiveness, as indicated by activity in the brain regions theoretically linked to persuasion. For the first time in this context, neuroimaging (i.e., fMRI) is used to show that normative messages activate brain regions linked to mentalizing, hedonic messages activate brain regions linked to affect and reward, and gain messages activate brain regions linked to personal gain and value. When comparing these goal frames, fMRI data reveal that normative messages activate brain regions associated with persuasion in prosocial contexts (i.e., moral cognition) more strongly than gain messages, and both elicit greater activation than hedonic messages. However, self-reported data only partially support this pattern. Hedonic messages are perceived as the least persuasive in promoting environmental behaviors, and gain-framed messages are rated as significantly more persuasive than normative messages. These results have important implications for governments and managers, who should design communications that appeal to peer-driven and community-based responsible behaviors. Such an approach could lead to a deeper evaluation of the message’s value and adherence to social norms. • fMRI revealed distinct neural bases for normative, hedonic, and gain-framed messages. • Normative messages activate brain regions linked to moral cognition. • Hedonic messages engage areas related to emotion and reward processing. • Gain messages stimulate neural regions tied to personal value and resources. • Normative messages excel in neural persuasion; gain messages dominate self-reports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102667
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural bases of goal-frame theory: Assessing the nature and persuasion of normative, hedonic, and gain environmental messages

Carla Rodríguez-Sánchez, Luis‐Alberto Casado‐Aranda, Juan Sánchez‐Fernández, Franco Sancho Esper et al.
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Neural bases of goal-frame theory: Assessing the nature and persuasion of normative, hedonic, and gain environmental messages

Carla Rodríguez-Sánchez, Luis‐Alberto Casado‐Aranda, Juan Sánchez‐Fernández, Franco Sancho Esper, Ricardo Sellers Rubio, İsmet Özer
article en

Abstract

Managers and policymakers have increasingly adopted the use of communication campaigns to promote environmentally responsible behaviors. Through a wide variety of frames, these campaigns can encourage more sustainable actions from citizens. Goal-frame theory suggests that three primary goals (normative, gain, and hedonic) can promote pro-environmental behavior in different ways when embedded in messages. This paper presents the first controlled experimental study of the processes that govern the activation of these goals and their subsequent impact on the persuasiveness of messages promoting pro-environmental behaviors (e.g., recycling, responsible water consumption, reduced electricity use, and handling of toxic products). The study shows the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the processing of normative, gain, and hedonic messages. It also reveals their comparative persuasiveness, as indicated by activity in the brain regions theoretically linked to persuasion. For the first time in this context, neuroimaging (i.e., fMRI) is used to show that normative messages activate brain regions linked to mentalizing, hedonic messages activate brain regions linked to affect and reward, and gain messages activate brain regions linked to personal gain and value. When comparing these goal frames, fMRI data reveal that normative messages activate brain regions associated with persuasion in prosocial contexts (i.e., moral cognition) more strongly than gain messages, and both elicit greater activation than hedonic messages. However, self-reported data only partially support this pattern. Hedonic messages are perceived as the least persuasive in promoting environmental behaviors, and gain-framed messages are rated as significantly more persuasive than normative messages. These results have important implications for governments and managers, who should design communications that appeal to peer-driven and community-based responsible behaviors. Such an approach could lead to a deeper evaluation of the message’s value and adherence to social norms. • fMRI revealed distinct neural bases for normative, hedonic, and gain-framed messages. • Normative messages activate brain regions linked to moral cognition. • Hedonic messages engage areas related to emotion and reward processing. • Gain messages stimulate neural regions tied to personal value and resources. • Normative messages excel in neural persuasion; gain messages dominate self-reports.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 105
University of Alicante (ES), Universidad de Granada (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.