Ecocide’s evolving relationship with war

This article examines the evolving relationship between ecocide and the regulation of war, tracing its conceptual development from a war crime to a broader environmental offence. Using a social constructivist approach, it explores how scientists, legal scholars and policymakers shaped the emergence of ecocide in response to environmental destruction during the Vietnam War. While early legal frameworks linked ecocide to armed conflict, contemporary advocacy has expanded its scope to include peacetime environmental harm. After exploring the factors that influenced that broadening in scope, the article considers whether and how contemporary formulations of ecocide might impact future attempts to ensure accountability for wartime environmental destruction. It argues that legal principles such as lex specialis limit ecocide’s applicability in conflict, even as domestic efforts seek to challenge these constraints. The article concludes that while ecocide’s legal recognition is growing, its capacity to address conflict-related environmental harm remains uncertain, highlighting the need for continued efforts to explore how existing international crimes can be used to encompass ecological destruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Security
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27538796251347111
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecocide’s evolving relationship with war

Rachel Killean
3 citations
Environment and Security
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
6.94
article

Ecocide’s evolving relationship with war

Rachel Killean
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article examines the evolving relationship between ecocide and the regulation of war, tracing its conceptual development from a war crime to a broader environmental offence. Using a social constructivist approach, it explores how scientists, legal scholars and policymakers shaped the emergence of ecocide in response to environmental destruction during the Vietnam War. While early legal frameworks linked ecocide to armed conflict, contemporary advocacy has expanded its scope to include peacetime environmental harm. After exploring the factors that influenced that broadening in scope, the article considers whether and how contemporary formulations of ecocide might impact future attempts to ensure accountability for wartime environmental destruction. It argues that legal principles such as lex specialis limit ecocide’s applicability in conflict, even as domestic efforts seek to challenge these constraints. The article concludes that while ecocide’s legal recognition is growing, its capacity to address conflict-related environmental harm remains uncertain, highlighting the need for continued efforts to explore how existing international crimes can be used to encompass ecological destruction.

Environment and Security
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
6.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ecocide’s evolving relationship with war — Rachel Killean · Environment and Security (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS