Systematic global stocktake of over 50,000 urban climate change studies

Abstract Taking stock of climate change evidence is essential to helping cities address climate change. However, such efforts face challenges in appraising the growing scholarship in this fast-moving area. Here we use supervised and unsupervised machine learning to identify and classify over 53,000 urban climate studies, creating a dynamic, interactive and searchable evidence database for researchers and policymakers. Nearly 20,000 are city-specific case studies, revealing a rapidly growing yet unevenly distributed knowledge base. Notably, small and fast-growing cities, particularly in Africa and Asia, remain substantially underrepresented, contributing to topical, geographic and disciplinary biases in previous Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessments. We propose three strategies to address this: (1) synthesizing case studies to support IPCC uptake, (2) identifying cross-city learning opportunities and (3) closing evidence gaps in the Global South. Thereby, our systematic stocktake helps inform adaptation and mitigation efforts in cities, guides future research and strengthens the IPCC’s ability to deliver robust, policy-relevant evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Cities
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-025-00260-8
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic global stocktake of over 50,000 urban climate change studies

William F. Lamb, Simon Montfort, Tim Repke, Max Callaghan et al.
12 citations
Nature Cities
Climate variability and models
13.26
article

Systematic global stocktake of over 50,000 urban climate change studies

William F. Lamb, Simon Montfort, Tim Repke, Max Callaghan, Chenxi Lu, Jan C. Minx, Felix Creutzig, Ke Ge
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract Taking stock of climate change evidence is essential to helping cities address climate change. However, such efforts face challenges in appraising the growing scholarship in this fast-moving area. Here we use supervised and unsupervised machine learning to identify and classify over 53,000 urban climate studies, creating a dynamic, interactive and searchable evidence database for researchers and policymakers. Nearly 20,000 are city-specific case studies, revealing a rapidly growing yet unevenly distributed knowledge base. Notably, small and fast-growing cities, particularly in Africa and Asia, remain substantially underrepresented, contributing to topical, geographic and disciplinary biases in previous Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessments. We propose three strategies to address this: (1) synthesizing case studies to support IPCC uptake, (2) identifying cross-city learning opportunities and (3) closing evidence gaps in the Global South. Thereby, our systematic stocktake helps inform adaptation and mitigation efforts in cities, guides future research and strengthens the IPCC’s ability to deliver robust, policy-relevant evidence.

Nature CitiesVol. 2(7)
University of Bern (CH), Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (CH), University of Leeds (GB), University of Sussex (GB), Leibniz Association (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate variability and models
13.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.