Entitlement to Paid Annual Leave in the Czech Legal System and the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union

Workers are dismissed from their jobs in countries across the European Union (and not only) every day. Understandably, some workers defend themselves against such dismissals in ways that national law allows them to, and they are often successful. However, the path from dismissal to that dismissal being declared unfair (void) can be thorny and long. Case law in the Czech Republic, as is also the situation in other countries, has already adjudicated on employment claims arising in cases of unfair dismissal. Thus, over time, the case law of the Czech national courts has taken the view that, in the special “period of uncertainty,” that is, the period from the contested legal action by which the employee is dismissed until the final decision of the court, relations of employment cannot be governed by a contract of employment, a collective agreement, internal regulations, or the relevant labor law, as those relations had continued unchanged. Therefore, during that period the employee is not entitled to compensation for wages or salary for leave not taken under the Czech Labor Code. However, this interpretation is not consistent with the interpretation of Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time and the (recent) case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. According to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), a worker who has been unlawfully dismissed from his/her employment and subsequently reinstated in accordance with national law, following a judicial decision annulling his/her dismissal is entitled to financial compensation for untaken paid annual leave for the period from the date of his/her unlawful dismissal until the date of reinstatement. This article focuses on the recent case law of the CJEU concerning the right to annual paid leave, not only in the context of the unlawful dismissal of an employee, and on the implications of this case law for Czech national practice. Thus, the central theme of the paper is a reasoned finding of the law on entitlement to financial compensation for untaken leave in light of national and supranational legislation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2025.2.12
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entitlement to Paid Annual Leave in the Czech Legal System and the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union

Michal Blažek, Michal Smejkal
Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

Entitlement to Paid Annual Leave in the Czech Legal System and the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union

Michal Blažek, Michal Smejkal
article en

Abstract

Workers are dismissed from their jobs in countries across the European Union (and not only) every day. Understandably, some workers defend themselves against such dismissals in ways that national law allows them to, and they are often successful. However, the path from dismissal to that dismissal being declared unfair (void) can be thorny and long. Case law in the Czech Republic, as is also the situation in other countries, has already adjudicated on employment claims arising in cases of unfair dismissal. Thus, over time, the case law of the Czech national courts has taken the view that, in the special “period of uncertainty,” that is, the period from the contested legal action by which the employee is dismissed until the final decision of the court, relations of employment cannot be governed by a contract of employment, a collective agreement, internal regulations, or the relevant labor law, as those relations had continued unchanged. Therefore, during that period the employee is not entitled to compensation for wages or salary for leave not taken under the Czech Labor Code. However, this interpretation is not consistent with the interpretation of Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time and the (recent) case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. According to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), a worker who has been unlawfully dismissed from his/her employment and subsequently reinstated in accordance with national law, following a judicial decision annulling his/her dismissal is entitled to financial compensation for untaken paid annual leave for the period from the date of his/her unlawful dismissal until the date of reinstatement. This article focuses on the recent case law of the CJEU concerning the right to annual paid leave, not only in the context of the unlawful dismissal of an employee, and on the implications of this case law for Czech national practice. Thus, the central theme of the paper is a reasoned finding of the law on entitlement to financial compensation for untaken leave in light of national and supranational legislation.

Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze(2(67)/2025)
Masaryk University (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.