Dimensions of logistics service quality framework for contactless last mile delivery: a systematic literature review

Purpose The logistic service quality (LSQ) model is a staple for evaluating key performance factors such as satisfaction and improving business performance. Given the lack of a universally accepted LSQ model, this paper aims to develop an integrated framework that measures the service quality of contactless delivery, incorporating both customer and LSP perspectives. Design/methodology/approach This was done through Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA), and six focus group discussion sessions were used to identify existing and new LSQ dimensions that were processed through triangulation. A total of 10 LSQ grouped dimensions with 46 specific sub-dimensions were validated and subsequently used in the survey questionnaire development that was further validated by a group of experts and through exploratory factor analysis. Findings A total of 30 unique dimensions are found to enhance satisfaction of stakeholders in contactless last-mile delivery, with respect to the perspective of both the customers and logistics service providers (LSPs). Originality/value This paper is the first to provide a set of validated logistics service quality framework which can be used to measure the level of quality that a service provider embodies. This framework covers the perspectives of both the service providers and customers, which is unique compared to previous works in the literature.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Benchmarking An International Journal
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-01-2025-0090
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dimensions of logistics service quality framework for contactless last mile delivery: a systematic literature review

Miriam Fabroa Bongo, James A. Tan, Jan Elaiza Go, Sean Arvin Sy et al.
2 citations
Benchmarking An International Journal
Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
2.01
article

Dimensions of logistics service quality framework for contactless last mile delivery: a systematic literature review

Miriam Fabroa Bongo, James A. Tan, Jan Elaiza Go, Sean Arvin Sy, Hannah Gwyneth Tagabucba
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose The logistic service quality (LSQ) model is a staple for evaluating key performance factors such as satisfaction and improving business performance. Given the lack of a universally accepted LSQ model, this paper aims to develop an integrated framework that measures the service quality of contactless delivery, incorporating both customer and LSP perspectives. Design/methodology/approach This was done through Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA), and six focus group discussion sessions were used to identify existing and new LSQ dimensions that were processed through triangulation. A total of 10 LSQ grouped dimensions with 46 specific sub-dimensions were validated and subsequently used in the survey questionnaire development that was further validated by a group of experts and through exploratory factor analysis. Findings A total of 30 unique dimensions are found to enhance satisfaction of stakeholders in contactless last-mile delivery, with respect to the perspective of both the customers and logistics service providers (LSPs). Originality/value This paper is the first to provide a set of validated logistics service quality framework which can be used to measure the level of quality that a service provider embodies. This framework covers the perspectives of both the service providers and customers, which is unique compared to previous works in the literature.

Benchmarking An International Journal
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.