The Impact of Intravascular Imaging (IVUS/OCT) Guidance on Preventing In-Stent Restenosis and Improving Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Complex PCI: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with complex coronary artery disease is associated with a higher risk of adverse events, including in-stent restenosis (ISR). Intravascular imaging, using either intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT), has been proposed to optimize stent implantation and improve outcomes, but its definitive role requires comprehensive evidence synthesis. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Major electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched from January 2014 to May 2025 for RCTs comparing intravascular imaging-guided PCI with angiography-guided PCI in patients undergoing complex procedures. The primary efficacy endpoint was Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization. The key secondary endpoint was angiographic ISR. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled Risk Ratios (RRs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). Results: Seven RCTs, enrolling a total of 9,150 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 24 months. Intravascular imaging guidance was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of MACE (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55-0.79; p<0.0001) compared to angiography guidance, with moderate heterogeneity (I²=52%). The risk of angiographic ISR was also significantly lower in the imaging-guided group (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.38-0.63; p<0.0001). Furthermore, imaging guidance led to a significant reduction in cardiac death (RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.38-0.80) and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.42-0.69). Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides definitive evidence that the use of intravascular imaging (IVUS or OCT) to guide complex PCI significantly reduces the incidence of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events and in-stent restenosis. These findings support the routine adoption of intravascular imaging as the standard of care to optimize outcomes in this high-risk patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioscientia Medicina Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm.v9i8.1369
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Intravascular Imaging (IVUS/OCT) Guidance on Preventing In-Stent Restenosis and Improving Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Complex PCI: A Meta-Analysis

Ferry Usnizar, Leonardo Lubis, Erwin Sukandi, Syamsu Indra et al.
Bioscientia Medicina Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

The Impact of Intravascular Imaging (IVUS/OCT) Guidance on Preventing In-Stent Restenosis and Improving Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Complex PCI: A Meta-Analysis

Ferry Usnizar, Leonardo Lubis, Erwin Sukandi, Syamsu Indra, Taufik Indrajaya
article en

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with complex coronary artery disease is associated with a higher risk of adverse events, including in-stent restenosis (ISR). Intravascular imaging, using either intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT), has been proposed to optimize stent implantation and improve outcomes, but its definitive role requires comprehensive evidence synthesis. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Major electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched from January 2014 to May 2025 for RCTs comparing intravascular imaging-guided PCI with angiography-guided PCI in patients undergoing complex procedures. The primary efficacy endpoint was Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization. The key secondary endpoint was angiographic ISR. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled Risk Ratios (RRs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). Results: Seven RCTs, enrolling a total of 9,150 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 24 months. Intravascular imaging guidance was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of MACE (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55-0.79; p<0.0001) compared to angiography guidance, with moderate heterogeneity (I²=52%). The risk of angiographic ISR was also significantly lower in the imaging-guided group (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.38-0.63; p<0.0001). Furthermore, imaging guidance led to a significant reduction in cardiac death (RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.38-0.80) and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.42-0.69). Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides definitive evidence that the use of intravascular imaging (IVUS or OCT) to guide complex PCI significantly reduces the incidence of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events and in-stent restenosis. These findings support the routine adoption of intravascular imaging as the standard of care to optimize outcomes in this high-risk patient population.

Bioscientia Medicina Journal of Biomedicine and Translational ResearchVol. 9(8)
Sriwijaya University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.