Write access provisioning and organizational ownership in open source software projects: Exploring the impact on project novelty and survival

Non-hierarchical organizational structures have gained popularity as a means to leverage the crowd's innovative potential. However, balancing the generation of new ideas with the long-term sustainability of innovation efforts remains a significant challenge, especially in the context of open-source software (OSS) projects. In the absence of formal authority and contracts, OSS projects rely on governance systems wherein the rights to maintain the project's source code are restricted to a small group of contributors. We argue that restricting write access to the source code for a core group is essential for effectively managing innovation in OSS projects. Specifically, we propose that the proportion of contributors with write access to the source code influences two key outcomes: project novelty and survival. Additionally, given the widespread adoption of OSS development practices by organizations, we examine how organizational ownership influences the relationship between write access provisioning and project outcomes. Analyzing a matched sample of 5762 OSS projects hosted on GitHub, we find that a higher proportion of contributors with write access enhances the project's novelty but reduces the project's survival . This relationship is further influenced by whether or not the project is organization-owned. We attribute these findings to the distinct roles played by contributors: those with write access to the project drive innovation by selecting and integrating new ideas, while those without write access to the project are crucial for ensuring the project's reliability and long-term survival. • Governance in open source software involves provision/restriction of write access to the source code. • Write access to the source code decision results in different impacts on novelty and survival. • Contributors with write access to the source code have an important role in novelty of the project. • Contributors without write access to the source code have an important role in reliability of the project. • Organizational ownership moderates the relationship between write access provisioning and project outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Policy
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105284
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Write access provisioning and organizational ownership in open source software projects: Exploring the impact on project novelty and survival

Shirish C. Srivastava, Saverio Dave Favaron, Poonacha K. Medappa
Research Policy
Open Source Software Innovations
article

Write access provisioning and organizational ownership in open source software projects: Exploring the impact on project novelty and survival

Shirish C. Srivastava, Saverio Dave Favaron, Poonacha K. Medappa
article en

Abstract

Non-hierarchical organizational structures have gained popularity as a means to leverage the crowd's innovative potential. However, balancing the generation of new ideas with the long-term sustainability of innovation efforts remains a significant challenge, especially in the context of open-source software (OSS) projects. In the absence of formal authority and contracts, OSS projects rely on governance systems wherein the rights to maintain the project's source code are restricted to a small group of contributors. We argue that restricting write access to the source code for a core group is essential for effectively managing innovation in OSS projects. Specifically, we propose that the proportion of contributors with write access to the source code influences two key outcomes: project novelty and survival. Additionally, given the widespread adoption of OSS development practices by organizations, we examine how organizational ownership influences the relationship between write access provisioning and project outcomes. Analyzing a matched sample of 5762 OSS projects hosted on GitHub, we find that a higher proportion of contributors with write access enhances the project's novelty but reduces the project's survival . This relationship is further influenced by whether or not the project is organization-owned. We attribute these findings to the distinct roles played by contributors: those with write access to the project drive innovation by selecting and integrating new ideas, while those without write access to the project are crucial for ensuring the project's reliability and long-term survival. • Governance in open source software involves provision/restriction of write access to the source code. • Write access to the source code decision results in different impacts on novelty and survival. • Contributors with write access to the source code have an important role in novelty of the project. • Contributors without write access to the source code have an important role in reliability of the project. • Organizational ownership moderates the relationship between write access provisioning and project outcomes.

Research PolicyVol. 54(8)
SKEMA Business School (FR), Tilburg University (NL), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Économie, Gestion (FR), HEC Paris (FR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Open Source Software Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.