Attending Church Encourages Acceptance of Atheists? Suppression Effects in Religion and Politics Research

Abstract A proliferation of religion variables presents opportunities for those studying religion and politics in the U.S. However, many studies in this growing subfield demonstrate the pitfalls of reporting the “independent” effects of variables without qualification. This is especially evident in work on Christian nationalism where researchers often make the claim that worship attendance promotes more pro-social or liberal outcomes, while Christian nationalism promotes more conservative and less pro-social outcomes. We demonstrate that this finding—and others like it—represents a new version of an old problem: a particular structure of relationships between variables that can induce sign switches based on suppression effects (Lenz and Sahn in Political Analysis 29(3):356–369, 2021). While we do not encourage skipping controls, some commonly reported results warrant caution. Researchers should generally avoid unconditional claims about attendance encouraging liberalism. We point a way forward that prioritizes theories of religious communication and encourages the careful examination of relationships via interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Behavior
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-025-10057-z
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attending Church Encourages Acceptance of Atheists? Suppression Effects in Religion and Politics Research

Paul A. Djupe, Jacob R. Neiheisel, Anand E. Sokhey, Andrew R. Lewis et al.
6 citations
Political Behavior
Religion and Society Interactions
25.21
article

Attending Church Encourages Acceptance of Atheists? Suppression Effects in Religion and Politics Research

Paul A. Djupe, Jacob R. Neiheisel, Anand E. Sokhey, Andrew R. Lewis, Amanda Friesen, Ryan P. Burge, Zachary D. Broeren
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract A proliferation of religion variables presents opportunities for those studying religion and politics in the U.S. However, many studies in this growing subfield demonstrate the pitfalls of reporting the “independent” effects of variables without qualification. This is especially evident in work on Christian nationalism where researchers often make the claim that worship attendance promotes more pro-social or liberal outcomes, while Christian nationalism promotes more conservative and less pro-social outcomes. We demonstrate that this finding—and others like it—represents a new version of an old problem: a particular structure of relationships between variables that can induce sign switches based on suppression effects (Lenz and Sahn in Political Analysis 29(3):356–369, 2021). While we do not encourage skipping controls, some commonly reported results warrant caution. Researchers should generally avoid unconditional claims about attendance encouraging liberalism. We point a way forward that prioritizes theories of religious communication and encourages the careful examination of relationships via interactions.

Political Behavior
Western University (CA), Eastern Illinois University (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Denison University (US), University of Cincinnati (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Religion and Society Interactions
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Attending Church Encourages Acceptance of Atheists? Suppression Effects in Religion and Politics Research — Paul A. Djupe, Jacob R. Neiheisel, et al. · Political Behavior (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS