A Study on the GHG Emission Factor of Co-Product Hydrogen in the NCC Process by LCA Allocation Methods

This study aims to quantify the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission factors of by-product hydrogen generated from the Naphtha Cracking Center (NCC) process using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and to analyze the differences in emission results based on the selection of allocation criteria. The allocation methods were categorized by referring to international LCA guidelines such as ISO 14044, EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF), ILCD Handbook, and Hy Guide. Four allocation criteria were applied: mass, lower heating value (LHV), economic value, and mole number. The study examines how the choice of allocation approach significantly influences LCA results and the calculated GHG emission factors. Mass-based allocation offers simplicity and general applicability, but lacks the ability to reflect product characteristics. LHV-based allocation is reasonable when all co-products are used as energy sources, but may not be appropriate when their end-uses vary. Economic allocation reflects market reality but is highly sensitive to price fluctuations. Mole-based allocation is theoretically sound as it reflects chemical stoichiometry, but its practical applicability is limited due to the lack of precedent in industrial or policy applications. The calculated GHG emission factors for each method were as follows 1.25 kgCO2eq./kgH2 for mass based allocation, 3.219 kgCO2eq./kgH2 for LHV based allocation, 13.24 kgCO2eq./ kgH2 for economic value based allocation, and 13.93 kgCO2eq./kgH2 for mole based allocation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62765/kjlca.2025.26.1.27
Primary Topic
Metallurgy and Material Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on the GHG Emission Factor of Co-Product Hydrogen in the NCC Process by LCA Allocation Methods

Seunghyun Jo, Jinpyo Cho, Eui-Chan Jeon
Korean Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Metallurgy and Material Science
article

A Study on the GHG Emission Factor of Co-Product Hydrogen in the NCC Process by LCA Allocation Methods

Seunghyun Jo, Jinpyo Cho, Eui-Chan Jeon
article en

Abstract

This study aims to quantify the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission factors of by-product hydrogen generated from the Naphtha Cracking Center (NCC) process using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and to analyze the differences in emission results based on the selection of allocation criteria. The allocation methods were categorized by referring to international LCA guidelines such as ISO 14044, EU Product Environmental Footprint (PEF), ILCD Handbook, and Hy Guide. Four allocation criteria were applied: mass, lower heating value (LHV), economic value, and mole number. The study examines how the choice of allocation approach significantly influences LCA results and the calculated GHG emission factors. Mass-based allocation offers simplicity and general applicability, but lacks the ability to reflect product characteristics. LHV-based allocation is reasonable when all co-products are used as energy sources, but may not be appropriate when their end-uses vary. Economic allocation reflects market reality but is highly sensitive to price fluctuations. Mole-based allocation is theoretically sound as it reflects chemical stoichiometry, but its practical applicability is limited due to the lack of precedent in industrial or policy applications. The calculated GHG emission factors for each method were as follows 1.25 kgCO2eq./kgH2 for mass based allocation, 3.219 kgCO2eq./kgH2 for LHV based allocation, 13.24 kgCO2eq./ kgH2 for economic value based allocation, and 13.93 kgCO2eq./kgH2 for mole based allocation.

Korean Journal of Life Cycle AssessmentVol. 26(1)
Ministry of Environment
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Metallurgy and Material Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.