Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Surveillance: A Cross-Disciplinary Assessment of Predictive Analytics and Ethical Concerns

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized various sectors, and public health surveillance is no exception. With the increasing frequency of global health threats, there is a growing reliance on AI-driven predictive analytics to detect, monitor, and respond to disease outbreaks in real-time. This paper explores the effectiveness, challenges, and ethical implications of integrating AI into public health surveillance systems. The research adopts a cross-disciplinary perspective involving medical professionals, epidemiologists, and public health administrators to holistically examine AI’s role in early outbreak detection, pattern recognition, and health data management. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating quantitative data from structured questionnaires and qualitative insights through case studies. Participants were drawn from government health departments, research institutions, and AI solution vendors. The questionnaire consisted of five key questions assessing AI adoption, trustworthiness, security, predictive capability, and ethical oversight. The responses indicated a high degree of optimism regarding AI's predictive strengths, with over 80% of respondents agreeing that AI improved outbreak forecasting. However, concerns regarding data privacy, algorithmic transparency, and ethical governance remain prevalent, particularly among public health administrators. A comparative case study of two regional surveillance systems—one in Kerala and another in Madhya Pradesh—further illustrates the disparity in AI readiness and policy frameworks. Kerala’s system, which leverages AI for real- time dengue and COVID-19 tracking, showed efficient and ethically sound practices. In contrast, Madhya Pradesh's implementation faced delays, data inconsistencies, and ethical ambiguity due to insufficient regulatory backing and infrastructure. The study highlights that while AI holds immense potential in enhancing surveillance efficacy, its deployment must be accompanied by robust ethical guidelines, stakeholder education, and context-specific adaptation. Without these, AI tools risk eroding public trust, misrepresenting vulnerable populations, and exacerbating existing health inequalities. Therefore, policy frameworks must prioritize transparency, fairness, and inclusivity in AI development and deployment. The paper concludes with strategic recommendations for ethical AI integration into public health systems, emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, continuous monitoring, and community-level engagement to realize the full promise of AI in healthcare surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edulogic International Journal for Multi Disciplinary Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63665/eijmr.v01i01.2
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Surveillance: A Cross-Disciplinary Assessment of Predictive Analytics and Ethical Concerns

Aprna Tripathi
Edulogic International Journal for Multi Disciplinary Research
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Surveillance: A Cross-Disciplinary Assessment of Predictive Analytics and Ethical Concerns

Aprna Tripathi
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized various sectors, and public health surveillance is no exception. With the increasing frequency of global health threats, there is a growing reliance on AI-driven predictive analytics to detect, monitor, and respond to disease outbreaks in real-time. This paper explores the effectiveness, challenges, and ethical implications of integrating AI into public health surveillance systems. The research adopts a cross-disciplinary perspective involving medical professionals, epidemiologists, and public health administrators to holistically examine AI’s role in early outbreak detection, pattern recognition, and health data management. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating quantitative data from structured questionnaires and qualitative insights through case studies. Participants were drawn from government health departments, research institutions, and AI solution vendors. The questionnaire consisted of five key questions assessing AI adoption, trustworthiness, security, predictive capability, and ethical oversight. The responses indicated a high degree of optimism regarding AI's predictive strengths, with over 80% of respondents agreeing that AI improved outbreak forecasting. However, concerns regarding data privacy, algorithmic transparency, and ethical governance remain prevalent, particularly among public health administrators. A comparative case study of two regional surveillance systems—one in Kerala and another in Madhya Pradesh—further illustrates the disparity in AI readiness and policy frameworks. Kerala’s system, which leverages AI for real- time dengue and COVID-19 tracking, showed efficient and ethically sound practices. In contrast, Madhya Pradesh's implementation faced delays, data inconsistencies, and ethical ambiguity due to insufficient regulatory backing and infrastructure. The study highlights that while AI holds immense potential in enhancing surveillance efficacy, its deployment must be accompanied by robust ethical guidelines, stakeholder education, and context-specific adaptation. Without these, AI tools risk eroding public trust, misrepresenting vulnerable populations, and exacerbating existing health inequalities. Therefore, policy frameworks must prioritize transparency, fairness, and inclusivity in AI development and deployment. The paper concludes with strategic recommendations for ethical AI integration into public health systems, emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, continuous monitoring, and community-level engagement to realize the full promise of AI in healthcare surveillance.

Edulogic International Journal for Multi Disciplinary ResearchVol. 01(01)
University of Rajasthan (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.